Live data from Hacker News

The .ing top-level domain

blog.google

151–160 of 333 posts

Re: The .ing top-level domain

#151
post #61

Several registrars are already selling general availability pre-orders. Does anyone know how this works? I have a feeling that, when the general availability period begins, if multiple people pre-ordered the same one, all but one of them are going to get screwed. Do they at least refund you?

Yes and yes.

If you really want a name badly, pony up more to get it sooner and beat out those other people.

Re: The .ing top-level domain

#152

Google registry indicates Namecheap is a preferred partner and supports .ing: https://www.registry.google/register-a-domain/ Yet when I go to Namecheap and attempt to register a .ing, it tells me "unsupported TLD." Which is it?

Namecheap isn't supporting the Early Access Program, so if you want to buy through them you'd have to wait until General Availability in December (and hope no one else got the name first through a different registrar that is doing EAP).

Re: The .ing top-level domain

#153
post #38

Nobody is actually doing anything interesting with these. It all seems to be marketing landing pages intended to direct you to the real URL.

> Nobody is actually doing anything interesting with these.

Now wait a second, that's not at all true. In my experience there are armies of people who use them to launch targeted phishing attacks at my business if they buy the goddamn thing before I do.

At a certain point if you are lucky enough to have a business that's worth targeting, every new gTLD is just another fuck.ing security expense.

Is phish.ing available?

Re: The .ing top-level domain

#156
...if we're going to keep doing this, why even have top level domains anymore? How do they improve UX?

Writing "draw.com" makes it clear you're referring to a (commercial) website. But "draw.ing"? Just drop the stupid dot: "drawing".

Re: The .ing top-level domain

#157

...if we're going to keep doing this, why even have top level domains anymore? How do they improve UX? Writing "draw.com" makes it clear you're referring to a (commercial) website. But "draw.ing"? Just drop the stupid dot: "drawing".

Every new TLD is a new opportunity for making money, and that’s why they won’t be going away anytime soon.

Re: The .ing top-level domain

#158
post #25

Great. There's a Dutch bank called ING. I can't wait for all the phish.ing to start. IMHO all those new TLDs are just a huge mistake and a blatant money-grab.

Sadly phish.ing is over $1000 / year.

Wouldn't it be called fish.ing instead, so you'd trick users.

Re: The .ing top-level domain

#159

I've reached generic TLD fatigue. There's a new one each week. I regularly buy domains with OVH since they have a wide array of TLDs at a good price[0]. Over the years I let many of them expire because either 1) I let my dreams die, or 2) I couldn't afford to renew it. Mostly it's because I let my dreams die, not financial shortcomings though. [0] https://www.ovhcloud.com/en/domains/tld/

[deleted]

Re: The .ing top-level domain

#160

Great. There's a Dutch bank called ING. I can't wait for all the phish.ing to start. IMHO all those new TLDs are just a huge mistake and a blatant money-grab.

Mobile app is already first class citizen at ING in some EU countries. One is unable to make transactions or even is locked out completely from all online channels after losing access to their mobile app, or if their app simply stops responding on tapping the "Confirm" button. Web is merely second class citizen. No idea how they arrived to this retarded architectue. Submitting any kind of architectural feedback to a…

Hm, last time I tried 3 years ago paper mails were their only channel (after opening an account online). They were so past century. If they do anything with this TLD before improving their basic banking platform/UX it will only prove the point of how retarded they have been.
Post reply on HN