Earlier quoted context omitted.
They got caught in the same thing that happened to Flexport and others in the freight industry. Price per shipment cratered -> Revenue cratered. (They make a % of each shipment) -> Losses spiked up. (Because they had fixed cost) Flexport had a burn run rate of $600M a year . Convoy had less burn but also less in the bank. https://www.theinformation.com/briefings/flexport-revenue-dr...
I thought Flexport was still hiring a month or two ago
Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
151–160 of 639 posts
Re: Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
#152I work for one of their competitors and I can empathize with them. My thoughts goes to all the employees and their families. The Freight business is collapsing after an unrealistic high during the pandemic. Since April 2022, revenue per load has decreased to about 70%, this means less ways to generate a profit under the same headcount. We also saw a decrease in volume as companies overstocked and consumer spending ha…
This just made me realize that things are back in stock regularly again. I suppose it happened slowly so I didn't notice, but shortages seem to be totally gone and things are back to 2019 stock levels.
Re: Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
#153Earlier quoted context omitted.
Last time I moved a car halfway across the U.S. I just went online, submitted a request, got a quote, paid and it was all done. It was about as friction-free as something like that can be. Just need to use a direct carrier like Intercity, NOT a broker. Brokers have infested Google SEO.
> Just need to use a direct carrier like Intercity, NOT a broker. So because you mentioned it I just called them for transporting by enclosed carrier on the east coast between 2 cities. High end car enclosed carrier. Intercity wanted $1995 for the same transport that the car dealer (a high end car dealer well established no less) want $1600 dollars for. Intercity essentially said 'busy time of year etc etc'. Didn't g…
Re: Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
#154Earlier quoted context omitted.
They got caught in the same thing that happened to Flexport and others in the freight industry. Price per shipment cratered -> Revenue cratered. (They make a % of each shipment) -> Losses spiked up. (Because they had fixed cost) Flexport had a burn run rate of $600M a year . Convoy had less burn but also less in the bank. https://www.theinformation.com/briefings/flexport-revenue-dr...
I thought Flexport was still hiring a month or two ago
Re: Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
#155Earlier quoted context omitted.
>CEO said there'll be no severance or healthcare. Classy. Learning a lot about how certain people treat their employees during these last couple of admittedly insane years. Good for future reference, I guess - though not much solace now. I feel for the employees. Edit: Wow, more responses than I thought! I admit that the tone of my comment was too reactionary, but my opinion stands. I won't modify the original commen…
Startups are not established businesses. They are inherently risky ventures. If you want to be coddled and showered with benefits, go join a Fortune 500. Startups are not for you.
Re: Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
#156Earlier quoted context omitted.
You know, it's rather impressive the lengths the US will goto to avoid socialized/single-payer health plans (for anyone who isn't in the military or poor or over 65 at least). That sounds rather cockamamy to me.
Medicare: 65,748,297 people enrolled [0] Medicaid and CHIP: 85,614,581 people enrolled [1] Military: 9.5 million people covered [2] The US has not one but two of the largest single payer health insurance programs in the world. Medicare alone has more people enrolled than any European country's single payer programs other than Germany (pop 83,294,633) and the UK (pop 67,736,802). [0] https://medicareadvocacy.org/medic…
As they said, it is bizarre the lengths the US will go to to maintain its layered system. It seems purpose built to screw people over.
Re: Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
What makes you think the executives are making anything from this? It's a startup, it ran out of money, it failed, there is nothing left. Joining a startup is risky.
Shutting down 3 months earlier, but everyone getting severance is an option. Let's not pretend it had to happen this way because it's a startup. They made the decision, if true, to use up every cent clinging on trying to find an exit or more runway.
As such, spending your last cent to try to find a lifeline makes far more sense than calling it quits early. It's also certainly not in the interests of investors to just call things off.
Re: Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
#158Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ex-Convoy employee here: if a company is shutting down, it obviously can't provide severance. It's not a matter of class or not.
If things are dire enough to close up shop now, they probably were dire enough to close up shop 2 months ago, and you can use the cash to give your employees some runway for finding new employment.
Re: Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
Startups are not established businesses. They are inherently risky ventures. If you want to be coddled and showered with benefits, go join a Fortune 500. Startups are not for you.
I didn't realize wanting healthcare while getting let go from a company I worked for was desiring to be "coddled."
And you aren't being "let go" - the entire company is going under. If you are laid off and the company stays healthy, it makes sense to have some concessions. But if the entire business ceases to exist. I don't know why would you expect anything from it.
Re: Trucking startup Convoy closes operations with no buyer
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
> I'd argue the business failing is a strong counterpoint to that assertion. That statement is pretty naive. There are plenty of things that can kill a startup without them having done anything specifically wrong at any level, let alone at the level of technical team.
Did this company need to burn their entire round in a single year? Probably not. Could they have established themselves with lower operating expenses and still grown over time? Probably.