Earlier quoted context omitted.
I use HF radio all the time from inside my home, in the middle of one of the densest cities in BC. Within the past few weeks I've made contacts with stations in Alaska, Belize, Costa Rica, Colombia, Russia and Japan with a radio inside my home in Vancouver, Canada. HF is 10000% usable in urban areas. It's not optimal or perfect, but it's just fine.
As someone who has always been interested in getting into ham radio - do you have any pointers on where to start or what to avoid?
Eliminating radio interference from Apple charger
151–160 of 179 posts
Re: Eliminating radio interference from Apple charger
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
I use HF radio all the time from inside my home, in the middle of one of the densest cities in BC. Within the past few weeks I've made contacts with stations in Alaska, Belize, Costa Rica, Colombia, Russia and Japan with a radio inside my home in Vancouver, Canada. HF is 10000% usable in urban areas. It's not optimal or perfect, but it's just fine.
As someone who has always been interested in getting into ham radio - do you have any pointers on where to start or what to avoid?
Avoid sinking a lot of money into a transceiver immediately before you've been operating for awhile and know what you're really interested in doing. You also do not need a rooftop antenna for HF (3-30 MHz; the frequencies that most often travel far) - a wire across your backyard can be quite effective.
Since you're here, I recommend getting started with digital modes like WSPR and FT8. They require a lot less power to make some surprising connections, and will teach you a lot about how propagation works and adjusting antennas, and because of the low power requirements, can be done with relatively inexpensive equipment. Some "old timers" grouch about how they're not "real" ham radio, but ignore them.
Edited to add: A good starting point that doesn't even require a license is to get an SDR receiver like the RTL-SDR and hook a long wire to it as an antenna, then listen for WSPR or FT8 signals with WSJT-X, and whatever else (other digital modes, Morse Code) with fldigi.
Re: Eliminating radio interference from Apple charger
#153Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you ELI5 how does this negatively affect the consumer and why should the consumer prefer the 'bad looking' choke option?
Ferrite chokes are large and heavy. They're also not free. So the product costs more, weighs more and gets bigger.
Re: Eliminating radio interference from Apple charger
#154Re: Eliminating radio interference from Apple charger
#155> This radio interference was also present on the aviation frequencies (around 124 MHz) How did this thing get FCC approval? What's it's FCC approval number? Who tested this thing? Want to look that up. If RF got outside the charger and into the USB cable, it's very badly designed. The power in the USB cable is DC. There shouldn't be any significant RF component. There should be ferrite beads and capacitors in the po…
Re: Eliminating radio interference from Apple charger
#156That's... not a magsafe charger? That's a USB-C NFC charger. By all means show it's shit in every possible way but let's not grace them by acknowledging it has anything to do with magsafe. That's a Applified Qi charger.
Are you saying that it’s a counterfeit? Apple sells this as a MagSafe charger: https://www.apple.com/shop/product/MHXH3AM/A/magsafe-charger
Re: Eliminating radio interference from Apple charger
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nothing there is going faster than about 300KHz, so the signal paths are not a big issue. If things had to go faster, there would be a proper ground plane. The tiny area around the switching IC did require careful layout (it just follows the Linear Technology data sheet) but the rest doesn't matter much. There is no one ground. The 120VDC side has an HV ground, and the 5VDC side has a ground. The important point is t…
> nothing faster than 300k That is exactly one of the misunderstandings I’m trying to warn that you are missing. I’m certain that your switching transition times are massively faster than the 300k period (each rise and fall time). You can have split grounds, but you don’t have traces under your grounds so in many cases you aren’t even effectively using them. You are grounding a portion of every signal inside every ot…
Re: Eliminating radio interference from Apple charger
#158This thread looks like a relevant one to mention an issue with the Mac Studio that causes large inrush currents when you plug it in. The power connector arcs badly enough to trip a domestic 30mA RCD, it's reproducable with several units and on different electrical circuits at both home and office.
I noticed exactly the same thing on a new Mac mini M2 base model when I conncted the power cord. Now I'm relieved that it seems to be a common problem. I don't know anything about electronics. Do you think this is some kind of defect or bad design of the power supply?
Re: Eliminating radio interference from Apple charger
#159The poster's assumption that this is caused by the Apple product could be incorrect. The emissions could be caused by the supply equipment noise propagating down the cable. The load presented by the Apple product could induce the supply equipment to emit noise at that frequency.
Re: Eliminating radio interference from Apple charger
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
I noticed exactly the same thing on a new Mac mini M2 base model when I conncted the power cord. Now I'm relieved that it seems to be a common problem. I don't know anything about electronics. Do you think this is some kind of defect or bad design of the power supply?
Apple is very generous on input capacitors for their power supplies. It's usually a sign a good design as it's one of the first places companies skimp; and ensures that even dirty wall power or highly spiky load will not trip the PSU and keep the computer fed. However, it is widely recognized that Apple overdid it on apple silicon macs. Like, they really should have skimped a bit on that one. (we have racks full of M…