Live data from Hacker News

macOS Sonoma is available today

apple.com

151–160 of 691 posts

Re: macOS Sonoma is available today

#151
post #68

> The implementations of the exfat and msdos file systems on macOS have changed; these file systems are now provided by services running in user-space instead of by kernel extensions. This sounds interesting! I really wish there was a native FUSE alternative on macOS; just recently I found myself in a pickle due to not being able to mount an ext4 boot volume on an SD card on my Mac at all. (Passing through to a VM wo…

I wish they did something so deleting files from the bin wouldn't take millenia on my iMac Pro. Yes, it's an old computer, but shouldn't that be a solved problem?

Not a real fix but doing it from the command line is usually strikingly faster.

Re: macOS Sonoma is available today

#152
post #26
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks. Is it not available from Apple directly though?

It's right at the top of the Mac App Store as 'featured' with this story. Yet somehoe it doesn't include an install link! https://apps.apple.com/gb/story/id1699686314 EDIT - COMMAND + R in the settings app will reload the page

That's just a "what's new". You can't install it from there.

Re: macOS Sonoma is available today

#153

I still don't understand why Apple is so bent on coupling application updates together with OS updates. I just want the new changes to Safari and Notes while I don't care about the other changes, why not have Safari be a normal application downloaded from the App Store, like the rest of us pleebs have to do when publishing apps?

I'm not sure why Notes needs to be bundled with the OS update, but Safari isn't. You can download Safari 17 for macOS Ventura as well! Only the features that require integration with other apps (such as auto-filling 2FA codes from Mail) require Sonoma.

Re: macOS Sonoma is available today

#154

Complete list of new features in macOS Sonoma: https://www.apple.com/macos/sonoma/pdf/macOS_All_New_Feature...

I was just about to say that there isn't any changes worthwhile in this release and that Apple employees x people in the marketing sub department that takes care of the yearly releases and they will – regardless of anything else – do the yearly release fanfare with all the bells and whistles :-).

Re: macOS Sonoma is available today

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The main reason people update their phone OS is for new emoji I can't avoid the anecdata game, so: what generation are you? I don't know a single person who would update their phone for a new emoji.

The real question is: why are emojis tied to operating system updates in Apple land?

To get people to upgrade! It's extraordinarily effective. They seem to always do it in the first major patch after a major release, to kinda ensure everyone gets a stable version of the OS.

Re: macOS Sonoma is available today

#156
post #68

> The implementations of the exfat and msdos file systems on macOS have changed; these file systems are now provided by services running in user-space instead of by kernel extensions. This sounds interesting! I really wish there was a native FUSE alternative on macOS; just recently I found myself in a pickle due to not being able to mount an ext4 boot volume on an SD card on my Mac at all. (Passing through to a VM wo…

> I really wish there was a native FUSE alternative on macOS Isn’t that what DriverKit can be used for? https://support.apple.com/en-gb/guide/security/secd0a47c14c : “DriverKit is the framework that allows developers to create device drivers that the user installs on their Mac. Drivers built with DriverKit run in user space, rather than as kernel extensions, for improved system security and stability. This makes for…

It seems like the only two types of drivers are generic USB device drivers and HID input drivers, though.

There needs to be some OS-side FUSE-like kernel interface for userspace drivers like this to be able to actually mount them in the VFS.

Re: macOS Sonoma is available today

#157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

macOS has felt “feature complete” to me for years now. There is nothing I really want from an OS. I only upgrade for the security benefits and so I can keep all my systems on the same release, since new systems can’t be downgraded. I actually appreciate not doing relentless “innovation” just for the sake of doing it. Microsoft does this by slapping new UIs on top of old every damn release. They often don’t even remov…

> macOS has felt “feature complete” to me for years now. > Microsoft does this by slapping new UIs on top of old every damn release This OS upgrade looks like it's mostly slapping new UIs on top of old, so I'm not sure this is "doing it right".

Microsoft keeps the old UI. At least Apple replaces it.

Re: macOS Sonoma is available today

#158

Complete list of new features in macOS Sonoma: https://www.apple.com/macos/sonoma/pdf/macOS_All_New_Feature...

> Explicit language handling. The keyboard will add explicit language that you use to your personal vocabulary list and will learn this usage for each different app. Explicit language that is learned is used for autocorrect and suggestions

This is ducking great.

Re: macOS Sonoma is available today

#159
post #127

I’ve used Nativefier for years and am excited for this new feature described in the release notes: > Web apps let you use any website like an app, complete with an icon in the Dock for faster access and a simplified toolbar for easier browsing.

Chrome has supported those PWA shortcuts in macOS at least several years...

But every time you opened one it would also open a separate Chrome window that you had to keep open, which made them kind of useless.

Re: macOS Sonoma is available today

#160
post #150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I reluctantly did buy Extfs from Paragon for this. It's too expensive I think, but there are just no free opensource solutions.

Doesn't that require breaking glass in Secure Boot these days, just like macFUSE? I'm not really willing to install a third-party kernel extension just for a custom file system I need once every few months anymore, especially given that Apple's native exFAT drivers now apparently run in the userspace. They should just make that capability available to the actual-userspace!

> Doesn't that require breaking glass in Secure Boot these days

You mean turning off system integrity protection? No. I have both ext4 and NTFS from Paragon, and didn't have to do that.

Post reply on HN