AI real-time human full-body photo generator

Post by kzrdude » Wed, Aug 23, 2023, 8:51 PM UTC

trebligdivad wrote: post #136

smeej wrote: post #24

Why is it impossible to generate a male model wearing anything other than rolled denim jean shorts? I've tried things like "long pants" or "ankle-length pants," but I cannot get it to stop putting them all in denim shorts!

Yeh; tbh I thought it did a reasonable job with them though https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e666d59563e6000e0... (The hairline is way off, and he's way too muscular) I at least don't spot anything too anatomically wrong.

Post by jrflowers » Wed, Aug 23, 2023, 8:57 PM UTC

joker_minmax wrote: post #144

jrflowers wrote: post #101

Finally a website that unprompted answers the question “What if Wednesday Addams had enormous breasts?” Edit: lol https://generated.photos/human-generator/64db2561ba3ed6000ca...

It gave you a Sims character?

Post by dotancohen » Wed, Aug 23, 2023, 9:03 PM UTC

mrguyorama wrote: post #131

dragonwriter wrote: post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you're wondering how it's so fast and cheap and they can generate variants so easily I assume its cheap because they are burning money to build a business, its not fast at all, and the quality... sucks. > And if you're wondering how it can look so good I’m not. I'm wondering why they’re trying to get people to use something worse than using a decent photorealistic SD1.5-based checkpoint with some basic prompt te…

Looking at the poses, it feels optimized for generating porn, but one example someone showed had a child's face (good god please don't let your "AI" system generate child anything if you want to sell it for porn purposes), and another user noted that their attempt error'd out because it "detected nudity", even though other users get given a nude model by default.

Post by CapitalistCartr » Wed, Aug 23, 2023, 9:12 PM UTC

stavros wrote: post #156

mrguyorama wrote: post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Looking at the poses, it feels optimized for generating porn, but one example someone showed had a child's face (good god please don't let your "AI" system generate child anything if you want to sell it for porn purposes), and another user noted that their attempt error'd out because it "detected nudity", even though other users get given a nude model by default.

[flagged]

Post by [deleted] » Wed, Aug 23, 2023, 9:20 PM UTC

kortex wrote: post #62

Oh yeah, totally ready for prime time, hyper realistic, SFW filter works great, not at all hallucinations /massive_sarcasm Actually NSFW, not safe for sanity. That's...not how body parts work: https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e644f39c8c0400108... Prompt was "young woman with tattoos in miniskirt" really nothing crazy there. But perhaps the latent space with that particular pose is particularly raunchy.