151–156 of 156 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Again, avoiding the issue with a allusory deflection.
What's the issue again? Everything works fine for me.
All you're doing now is acting childish afaict, which just reinforces the view you've given of your position being based in immaturity, ignorance and idiocy.
Reread the thread and address the issue explicitly stated or just stop and accept your position is a failed one.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's the issue again? Everything works fine for me.
I've been exceedingly clear. All you're doing now is acting childish afaict, which just reinforces the view you've given of your position being based in immaturity, ignorance and idiocy. Reread the thread and address the issue explicitly stated or just stop and accept your position is a failed one.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've been exceedingly clear. All you're doing now is acting childish afaict, which just reinforces the view you've given of your position being based in immaturity, ignorance and idiocy. Reread the thread and address the issue explicitly stated or just stop and accept your position is a failed one.
[flagged]
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The collateral provably exists because blockchain code is public and ownership is secured via cryptography. Are you asking about an off-chain asset that is brought on-chain? For that, you are correct you need to rely on a socially trusted institution that attests that the off-chain asset isn't actually owned by someone else. There are some off-chain assets that are tokenized and are very trustworthy, IMO, such as USD…
So, by definition, the only asset that doesn't have external costs which make the SC cost _more_ than traditional paper contracts are those where the collateral asset is the exact same currency as will be issued? You do see the glaring issue there right? As for combative, I am beyond tired of the games played by crypto folks when it comes to answering basic questions they should already have the answers for. If they…
I did answer your questions.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So, by definition, the only asset that doesn't have external costs which make the SC cost _more_ than traditional paper contracts are those where the collateral asset is the exact same currency as will be issued? You do see the glaring issue there right? As for combative, I am beyond tired of the games played by crypto folks when it comes to answering basic questions they should already have the answers for. If they…
> As for combative, I am beyond tired of the games played by crypto folks when it comes to answering basic questions they should already have the answers for. I did answer your questions.
Allusions are not answers.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> As for combative, I am beyond tired of the games played by crypto folks when it comes to answering basic questions they should already have the answers for. I did answer your questions.
No you absolutely did not. Allusions are not answers.