Earlier quoted context omitted.
It was misplaced trust. That's a really easy mistake to make until you've been burned by it. I'll bet that person won't make that mistake a second time. But better is to avoid swimming with the sharks at all. I have a wonderful horror story about a business deal I made where I was cheated out of about $5 mil. I didn't trust the party I was doing the deal with, so the contract negotiations took most of a year and the…
I feel like the story of the scorpion and the frog applies here. My solution is to try very, very hard not to engage with people I do not trust. My mantra is "good people do good things, bad people do bad things". If you don't want bad things to happen to you, stay away from people you know to be bad regardless of how tempting it may be to associate with them.
StabilityAI cofounder says CEO tricked him into selling stake for $100
151–160 of 239 posts
Re: StabilityAI cofounder says CEO tricked him into selling stake for $100
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
From a control point of view, and maybe a salary or job viewpoint, this isn't too good. But enlighten me how a 40% odd share distribution of a now PE-owned and operated company would be a bad thing? Surely they're going to try and increase the company's value for their own self interest?
PE and Founder interests are not as aligned as many would assume at face value. Founders often care about doing good by their customers, vendors, employees... while the average PE firm will happily screw everyone over the moment there's a monetary incentive to do so. If a founder has the same time horizon for an exit as the PE/VC and if the founder is emotionally detached from the business/product/customers/employees…
Re: StabilityAI cofounder says CEO tricked him into selling stake for $100
#153Earlier quoted context omitted.
Zuckerberg (and a small group of other Meta shareholders) hold shares that have 10x as much voting power as normal shares. He has about 90% of those special shares, giving him a solid majority in most matters. Some other companies like Lyft or Alphabet have similar structures, but it is very unusual.
I'm actually surprised it's not more common. If I buy meta stock I have zero expectation of being able to sway company decisions. I just care that if they make money I make money.
Re: StabilityAI cofounder says CEO tricked him into selling stake for $100
#154Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, I had a similar conversation with a founder a while back. Company he had founded was getting acquired. He was a minority stakeholder at this point. No ability to oppose the acquisition. Acquiring company wanted him to sign docs saying "I relinquish all my interest for no compensation". His answer was basically something like "I think you can spare $10000 if this is that important"
Doesn't make sense without additional facts. Such an agreement would not be valid in court as there wouldn't be an exchange of consideration.
Consideration is only required to enforce a contract for future performance, since otherwise there is no harm in breaking the contract.
Re: StabilityAI cofounder says CEO tricked him into selling stake for $100
#155Earlier quoted context omitted.
Simple answer: A successful founder will sell 1 (maybe 2) companies in their lifetime, while PE/VC firms do these deals every day of the week. It's like entering the ring with a pro MMA fighter and expecting to have a fair fight. You have a massive disadvantage that can't be overcome. The best you can do is take precautions and "do your best" but "your best" and "precautions" still isn't good enough if your opponent…
> The buyer usually waits until the very last minute, then drops the bomb on the seller "Btw, we can't do the deal anymore at this price, but we can sign tomorrow for 30% less". The sad part is it's such a common tactic and PE firms will do things like encourage founders to get their whole team excited about the transaction -before- dropping the bomb / new deal terms. At which point the founder is basically trapped w…
Re: StabilityAI cofounder says CEO tricked him into selling stake for $100
#156I was chatting with a company who sold a large minority stake in their company to a well known private equity group (think 49%) with the explicit purpose of retaining control. Soon after the transaction closed, the PE firm was able to covertly buy another 2% of voting shares from a pre-existing investor in the company, which resulted in the PE firm gaining full majority control over the company, kicked out the CEO, r…
> So much business is done in bad faith and the people on the losing end rarely have the ability to warn others of their experience without killing their own reputation.
The M&A world is much smaller than you think. These reputations get around and the story you're referring is an exception not the norm.
Availability bias 101.
Source - work in PE, rarely see this happen.
Re: StabilityAI cofounder says CEO tricked him into selling stake for $100
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
One other advantage of buying family run bootstrapped businesses is that they're too small to trip antitrust scrutiny. There are entire industries whose driving consolidation force is a handful of PE firms buying up old family businesses and running them into the ground. Things like funeral homes, dental offices, and the like. Yes, I did learn about this from Cory Doctorow, why do you ask?
Links? I’d love to read more.
Re: StabilityAI cofounder says CEO tricked him into selling stake for $100
#158Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the usual path in this type of situation is to dual-class shares Is that still tolerated by investors? Is it still legal? "Having your cake and eating it" is a really bad attitude
> "Having your cake and eating it" is a really bad attitude Ray Dalio says the following in his book Principles : “When faced with the choice between two things you need that are seemingly at odds, go slowly to figure out how you can have as much of both as possible. There is almost always a good path that you just haven't figured out yet, so look for it until you find it rather than settle for the choice that is the…
At an old job, I worked with an eng manager who believed software quality and time to market were mutually exclusive. You decide which one is important to you and you go for that one.
In his thinking, he then constantly failed to identify options that were both fast to build and good, usually due to significant simplification. He could never find these things because in his mind you couldn't have both.
Later on, I worked for Ray for a few years and would always think of this dude whenever I encountered this principle.
Re: StabilityAI cofounder says CEO tricked him into selling stake for $100
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
The loose association was with decent researchers, no need to bring them down. I do agree about the rest.
Mediocre in regard to the standard set by other research teams pulling $1B+ valuations. The OpenAI founding team and the recently announced team at xAI are what I would consider to be exceptionally strong groups. Adept, Anthropic, Inflection, and character.ai are also strong. Look at the track records and accolades of researchers at these groups. Ilya Sutskever alone has more research experience than the combined tea…
Re: StabilityAI cofounder says CEO tricked him into selling stake for $100
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
Stories like this are bizarre. There are a million ways to ensure rights for a founder-owner that do not depend on 51% ownership, such as requiring supermajority votes for replacing the CEO, or right of first refusals granted to the founder-owner for share transfers. If they throw a fit about those terms, then don't do the deal! If you are selling shares to a PE firm with the explicit goal of retaining control, and y…
Simple answer: A successful founder will sell 1 (maybe 2) companies in their lifetime, while PE/VC firms do these deals every day of the week. It's like entering the ring with a pro MMA fighter and expecting to have a fair fight. You have a massive disadvantage that can't be overcome. The best you can do is take precautions and "do your best" but "your best" and "precautions" still isn't good enough if your opponent…
"You had better sell your business to us for a pittance, otherwise we'll lock you out of future deals."
"Ok, here you go. Now can you fund my new thing?"
"Ha! After we screwed you so hard last time? No way, you'll just set our money on fire out of spite. Way too risky."