Live data from Hacker News

Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

wsj.com

151–160 of 204 posts

Re: Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is almost like they needed the news to be distracted for some reason.... hmmm

Sometimes, on a planet with 8 billion people, more than one newsworthy event happen concurrently without coordination or conspiracy.

While true, it is also true the person that controls if information can be released or not from military channels, aka the commander in chief, is also the one that has several high profile news stories cooking

Re: Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

#152
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe James Cameron called it being turned into a, "meat cloud." Absolutely occurred in under 30ms (upper bound). Possibly as quick as 2ms, and in all likelihood well under 10ms.

blink of an eye is 100ms on average so it was faster than the blink of an eye.

They died faster than their brain could process any pain.

Re: Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think they were pretending to look, they were just (rightly) remaining open to it being either rescue or recovery. From the article: > “While not definitive, this information was immediately shared with the Incident Commander to assist with the ongoing search and rescue mission.” So: * They knew about it and quickly aided in the search. * They did not broadcast the details of the collection to the public. Tha…

[flagged]

People shouldn't even be aware of the loss of this sub. I feel like we're in a black mirror episode, who gives a fuck ? seriously

Re: Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Theres an avid discussion on the other thread about this, but the short answer is likely yes. They were probably crushed, incinerated and then bludgeoned to death in less than 3ms, and probably unconscious before they were aware of any of the rest of it.

Damn, why don't we execute people that way (if we're still executing people, that is)?

Because the executed's family still have a right to bury their dead, not poor him in closed casket. Besides, once the person is executed, it's considered they paid for their actions and deserve basic human decency.

Re: Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

#156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Theres an avid discussion on the other thread about this, but the short answer is likely yes. They were probably crushed, incinerated and then bludgeoned to death in less than 3ms, and probably unconscious before they were aware of any of the rest of it.

Incinerated? Where did the fire come from?

Mantis Shrimp kill using a similar concept

Video showing a Mantis Shrimp punching a shell incredibly quickly it creates a vacuum which generates intense heat and a flame .. under water!

> https://youtu.be/ti2Uoc1RXuQ?t=128

Re: Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

#158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They used SOSUS to detect what happened to the USS Scorpion when it disappeared. Wasn't disclosed until many, many years later. SOSUS was highly classified until very recently.

SOSUS may have been classified but you could read about it 40+ years ago.

But not it's true purpose: tracking Soviet submarines.

Re: Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

#159
post #145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The First Amendment doesn't mention anything about secrets, that's not what this is about. If I sell you a stolen item, and you know it is stolen , you're guilty of a crime. If you later try to sell or move those goods, that's a more severe crime, fencing. In this case the reporter is obtaining "stolen" information and passing it along, it's exactly the "fencing" of information. I'm aware this practice has been going…

Normal citizens have no obligation to keep the secrets of any government organisation. It is the person who holds security clearance that leaks the document that commits a crime, whereas journalists have a constitutionally protected right to publish. It's not sleazy, and is part of a healthy system that holds governments to account.

eh, not quite. The laws which protect secret information apply to everyone (it does require that you have reason to believe the information is secret, but it does not require that you have clearance). There are however quite powerful defenses considering the 1st amendment, especially for journalists (in other countries this often much less strong, though usually there's something analogous. For example the somewhat famous idea of signing the official secrets act in the UK doesn't mean anything except that the penalties for breaking it get more severe: you can still expect to be prosecuted under it if you are handed information marked as secret and then pass it on, unless you can succesfully argue that it is somehow in the public interest for it to be published).

Re: Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

#160
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

the same searcher documents the search for Bill at a nearby park, and whom was finally found just recently. There’s some good YouTube on the theory on that one.

Been lookin over that and it's a very interesting one. The man has got to have done the most extensive and exhaustive search for a missing person in goddamn history damn near by himself what with all the criss-crossing lines and different search methods. There's a kind of fascination with that sort of dedication makes one darn near want to jump up and volunteer just from the pull of it. Though have to edit to say, I…

This video offered a good theory based on all data: https://youtu.be/2J9wsJb8P1Y

A sobering realization how dangerous a simple walk can be.

Post reply on HN