Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Hello Dolly: Democratizing the magic of ChatGPT with open models

databricks.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

151–160 of 194 posts

Re: Hello Dolly: Democratizing the magic of ChatGPT with open models

#151

Post by thequadehunter »

thewataccount wrote: post #27

I might be having a moment - but I can't find any links to a git repo, huggingface, or anything about the models/weights/checkpoints directly from the article. I just see a zip download that AFAIK also doesn't contain the weights/checkpoints. I find this a bit odd, the contents of the zip (from the gdrive preview) look like they should be in a git repo, and I assume they download the model from somewhere? GDrive usua…

Lol. This is classic ML crap. Files with no documentation, no links, multiple files with the same-ish name but no explanation for which one is what.

Re: Hello Dolly: Democratizing the magic of ChatGPT with open models

#152

Post by bogwog »

Open Assistant is doing the same thing, but actually creating a dataset that isn't on questionable legal grounds by creating a gamified web app where people can contribute: https://open-assistant.io/dashboard

I wonder how small can these models get? From 175B to 6B with comparable performance is huge, but can it go lower?

Re: Hello Dolly: Democratizing the magic of ChatGPT with open models

#157

Post by iudqnolq »

rnosov wrote: post #89
sp332 wrote: post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, but you could be banned from using OpenAI products in the future, which seems like quite a liability for a researcher or company.

That would be anticompetitive practice that is actually against the law in many countries[1]. In the unlikely event of OpenAI ever engaging in such things they will be sued into oblivion. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refusal_to_deal

No it wouldn't. Wikipedia has a crap definition that inexplicably focuses on cartels where multiple companies coordinate the refusal, which this definitely isn't. The FTC has a better definition for US law [1].

Companies routinely ban users for ToS violations. Just look at any thread about Google on here to see people complaining about it.

[1]: https://www.ftc.gov/advice-guidance/competition-guidance/gui...

Post reply on HN