Live data from Hacker News

After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

livelaw.in

151–160 of 230 posts

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#151
post #140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

While Signal does require a phone number to register, they only know your phone number, your date of registration and the date of your phones last connection to signal's servers. Anyone requesting your information from them needs to provide your phone number, so any info they can get is account creation date and date of last connection.

Signal shouldn't ask for phone numbers. I don't give a shit what the justification is.

Disagree

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Jabber/XMPP, Matrix are the obvious answers.

I'll get my mum right onto it

I got my entire immediate family on Matrix without too much difficulty. The only big issue happened when my mom got a new iPhone and it cloned the old Element install from her old iPhone, causing two devices to have the same set of identity keys and we had to reset them.

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#153
post #21
post #2

Don't use messengers that ask for your phone number and aren't end-to-end encrypted. Use services that store as little data as possible. If data is stored, it can be given away and I would assume that it will be given away. Telegram disguises itself as encrypted chat app, when it is actually just a regular centralized plaintext messenger that has an encryption feature that nobody uses.

End-to-end encryption doesn't protect you from this, since any recipient can report illegal material to the authorities and trigger an investigation of the sender.

I’m that case, literally nothing will protect you from this. Any recipient can put anyone in any conversation.

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#154
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Telegram disguises itself as encrypted chat app Where does it do this?

https://telegram.org/ > Private > Telegram messages are heavily encrypted and can self-destruct.

LOL! Yeah, but your at-rest message remains UNENCRYPTED on Telegram's servers.

They are referring to in-transit message over Internet as virtually indecipherable: Nothing a court warrant can't get directly from their servers.

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'll get my mum right onto it

In all fairness, I got my entire non-technical family onto xmpp/jabber with Snikket (which is a highly opinionated packaging of existing xmpp server and clients with minor tweaks). They scan a QR code to download the app and join the server. It is e2ee out of the box and the experience is quite comfortable and seamless, even for a non-technical person.

Can they use it to chat with classmates from high school? Given my parents generation (Boomer, born 1948), they're mostly all on Facebook, so they either use Facebook groups+Messenger, SMS, or email (yikes!). Family chat is just on a giant SMS chain, which admittedly is awkward as there are several "sub-chains" with some people removed.

Or is my family just weird in their chat preferences?

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#156
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is not the first case for Telegram. So, Durov will continue with his show... they claim that Telegram is e2e encrypted, but don't mention that needs to be activated per chat

They don't claim this. They claim Cloud Chats are encrypted, which is true and only claim e2ee for Secret Chats, which is also true.

But a court can easily get UNENCRYPTED message while in at-rest stage directly from the hard drive on their server.

Don't worry, you're safe from hackers, deep state, and foreign nation-state from eavesdropping on ya over the net through their awesomely robust and intensely-touted advertised EE2E capability.

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>>americans/europeans can hardly imagine. Americans and Europeans have the desire to learn this lesson the hard way. They lack the wisdom to learn from others and instead believe their governments are the noble governments that would never violate their rights for power.

Traditionally Americans are quite suspicious of their government. The battles over 1st Amendment free speech and 2nd Amendment gun rights, among many, are a testament that the sentiment is still widely held.

>>Traditionally Americans

Traditional Americans are few and far between these days. Decades of "liberal" education pushing a rose colored view of strong central governments have changed the American Culture this is why you see younger voters increasingly looking to government not community to solve their problems.

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So what exactly is your threat model here that signal doesn't counter? They need to know your phone number before asking signal about it.

In much of the world, for the government at least, that is a given: you can't get a phone number without presenting legal ID, and the issuer of the phone number is required by law to maintain this association. This is true in much of Europe, for example.

So what exactly do you think will happen? The government tells signal "We know that simiones phone number is +1 12345678, give us his registration date!"?

I don't get your threat model.

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

While Signal does require a phone number to register, they only know your phone number, your date of registration and the date of your phones last connection to signal's servers. Anyone requesting your information from them needs to provide your phone number, so any info they can get is account creation date and date of last connection.

Phone number is enough to find who is behind it in most cases.

Yes, Signal is not an anonymous messenger and it is not meant to be. It's a SECURE messenger, that will not reveal metadata or message contents. It DOES reveal who you are, which is intentional and important to prevent spam. Without that feature, Signal would be significantly less useful for me.

Re: After Delhi High Court ruling, Telegram discloses personal details of users

#160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'll get my mum right onto it

There is no technical barriers that can not be overcome to allow the use of XMPP by normal non-technical users. GChat for years was XMPP until google got a market share they desired and choose to take their users off an open protocol in favor of their own one (which they then killed a few years later )

Technical barriers are not usually how non-technical people choose technology - it's usually based on things like UX and how many of their friends already using the service.
Post reply on HN