Live data from Hacker News

We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX

twitter.com

151–160 of 440 posts

Re: We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX

#151
post #95

Honestly, I think this is a really dumb move by Binance. They have taken a look under the hood, determined that FTX is bankrupt and then told everyone that is the case. Now there's going to be a widespread crypto panic that is going to cause other exchanges to collapse, and ultimately I expect Binance too will go down.

Dumb? It would be shockingly out-of-character if Binance isn’t utilizing strategies to make fat, fat stacks here.

Re: We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX

#152

In the thick of it, illiquidity and insolvency blur. But not after the fact. As usual, Levine put it best: “the problem is not a timing mismatch, in which FTX’s customers asked for their cash back but FTX did not have enough ready cash because it had long-term but money-good loans out. The problem is that FTX took its customers’ money and traded it for a pile of magic beans, and now the beans are worthless and there’…

That’s why I hate when people in these discussions refer to needing/providing “liquidity”. It feels like such a weasel word. Unless you know enough to conclude it’s really a cash flow mismatch, then don’t mince words or overcomplicate it.

Money. They need some g/d m/fing money. Maybe they need it as arms-length loans on legitimately illiquid capital. Maybe they need underpriced loans for the risk of the business. Maybe they just need a giant dump of free cash.

But it’s money they need. To weasel it away as “liquidity” is to assume something you probably have no way of knowing until later.

It was particularly dubious in the case of FTX, whose assets were in popular cryptocurrencies, which are traded every millisecond. You can absolutely find a buyer instantly! At about the same price it traded for five minutes ago! Just not at the price you need it to be.

“No, no, the fair market price is actually much higher, it’s just that there’s only one guy who would actually buy it all right now!” No. Stop. We already have a word for an asset that exactly one person wants to pay a positive price for: worthless (because they only have to outbid everyone else).

Sorry, /rant

Re: We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX

#153
post #92

What's even more funny is that Binance make it look like they are a stable financial institution, and it's thanks to their high standards that they won't acquire FTX. Binance is most probably much more of a fraud than FTX. Binance doesn't even have physical headquarters in any country in this world - and the reason is that they are being actively investigated or banned almost everywhere.

I don't know about it, Binance has become a gold standard in crypto exchange business. Here on HN it was always about Coinbase likely because its an American company but for the rest of the world, it's all about Binance and the rest of the world is huge. How huge? About an order of magnitude to Coinbase. If Binance goes, crypto isn't coming back.

Correct until the last I think. Every exchange is looking international because they know what you’re saying too. If Binance goes, there’s a mix of enough international toeholds from regulated exchanges and enough defi to keep the markets live.

Re: We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX

#154

The funny thing is for six months I have been checking FTX for open developer positions. Thinking surely, the best place in crypto must be hiring good devs like me. And there have been no postings at all! And word on the street is their devs actually building the exchange made a middling salary with zero stock. I always found it odd, how could they not be hiring? even during the downturn? And now I know why, it was a…

They were hiring. I applied a few months ago and got an email from them, but never followed up.

Re: We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX

#155
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Bitcoin protocol and network continues to operate exactly as expected. Here, people trusted a "bank" (an exchange acting like a bank), and got burned when the bank gambled and lost.

Without exchanges like FTX or Coinbase, how should general public acquire crypto?

Use an exchange that publishes proof of reserves, and take custody of your crypto immediately.

Re: We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX

#156
post #30

Maybe people will finally get some sense and stop storing their wealth in digital currency that is backed by absolutely nothing. I think a lot of dominoes are about to fall in the crypto world

At present no major currency is backed by anything material but trust. USD, for example, is only viable because, at the deepest level, trust in it is enforced by US army. There are three major class of people who need digital currency: (1) who are super rich and won't care about putting their 1% of wealth for "diversify and forget", (2) who need to transfer money eyes off from governments, (3) people who need alterna…

Chinese yuan is economically backed by state owned companies that routinely sell essential goods and services at below market prices when they otherwise would rise too fast.

Re: We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX

#157
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

reminds me of LTCM...they were making bank until the Asian bank crisis and Russia defaulting on their debt https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x225si7

Very different. LTCM was making massive, very risky bets while pretending they were safe. They were making insanely leveraged bets on real assets. FTX seems to me to much closer to Madoff. They were printing their own Monopoly money and pretending it was worth billions.

FTX was the next iteration of beanie babies.

They held a huge supply of an illiquid asset that they made the market on. No surprise that they would offer a high price and then say "these are worth a lot." This happened with beanie baby sellers: they would corner the market on one model and the jack the price. The problem is that nobody else thought they were worth that much.

Then, FTX made it worse by allowing people to borrow against them at the valuation of "a lot," and borrowing against them at the same valuation.

Re: We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX

#158
post #30

Maybe people will finally get some sense and stop storing their wealth in digital currency that is backed by absolutely nothing. I think a lot of dominoes are about to fall in the crypto world

At present no major currency is backed by anything material but trust. USD, for example, is only viable because, at the deepest level, trust in it is enforced by US army. There are three major class of people who need digital currency: (1) who are super rich and won't care about putting their 1% of wealth for "diversify and forget", (2) who need to transfer money eyes off from governments, (3) people who need alterna…

If the crypto-bros had a militia as powerful as the US army then perhaps crypto would be worth something.

Re: We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX

#159

From reports I've heard floating around, Alameda was making >$1M per day doing their good ol' prop trading. If that's true (and that's a big if) then all SBF had to do was simply stick to the playbook. Do you prop trading on the side, help customers transact crypto via FTX. How do you even mess it up this badly?

By getting greedy and treating FTX user funds as capital to deploy in the prop trading firm.

I know, right? Soon the defi community will be calling for the own version of Glass-Steagall. What is old is new again, I guess.

Knowing when to stop is genius.

Re: We will not pursue the potential acquisition of FTX

#160
post #70

Why does anyone trust Binance either? They’re notoriously shady about where they operate and what assets they actually hold, to the point that they’re officially not headquartered anywhere. If you have $100k at Binance, is there any reason to believe you could withdraw it tomorrow? Any contract you may have with Binance is made with a local shell company that could just as well be a hot dog stand. Any money you’ve se…

They slowly built/clean their reputation, bitcoin going up to 70k made everyone just forget the past.

But yeah, they are probally the most shady ones, but the fact they actually have no offices and no govs after them, makes it easier to hide your operations, its the same for tether that has managed to get so big with absolutely no offices, no employees or anything.

Both are best friends.

Post reply on HN