Earlier quoted context omitted.
> implication and conclusions don't need to be explicitly stated. But you would do well to ask, because you got it totally wrong. The commenter said that they are against this type of libertarian idealism. Because the result is that it isn't a flat democracy. Instead folks like Musk end up with huge amounts of power. Specifically you need to understand what they said here: "If power is concentrated in government, it'…
flat democracy in this case means no power concentration and everyone votes on everything. as opposed to what the US currently has, which is a representational democracy where power is concentrated at the government level with people electing others to represent them (and to wield more power than they, themselves, do). ---- If someone tells you power concentrated in the government is bad and power should be evenly di…
Re: Former WSJ reporter says law firm used Indian hackers to sabotage his career
#151Never talked about evenly distributed power. Just not too concentrated.
A power differential is not inherently bad, I can't see a system working without it. But the size of that differential should be kept to a minimum that allow the system to work.