Live data from Hacker News

Does Company ‘X’ have an Azure Active Directory Tenant?

shawntabrizi.com

151–160 of 197 posts

Re: Does Company ‘X’ have an Azure Active Directory Tenant?

#151

They have it in some capacity. Most places still have a very significant on-prem or self hosted instance of AD.

This, a company/person just needs to sign up for Office 365 and then an Azure AD tenant "exists" for them as the Office 365 are in there.

Re: Does Company ‘X’ have an Azure Active Directory Tenant?

#154

I know next to nothing about AD, but my company appears to match against this merely because we have an Office 365 account (from which we do nothing except download Word and Excel every now and then) so it doesn't necessarily mean you're using whatever it is much.

If you have Office 365 you have AAD. If you use pretty much any cloud hosted Microsoft business services, (E# licenses) you are using AAD. If you are using Azure, you are using AAD.

Re: Does Company ‘X’ have an Azure Active Directory Tenant?

#156
post #6

I thought it would be 100%; everyone switched to AD after Novell. What are the 16.6% using is the interesting part?

Nearly 100% have on-prem AD (full name: "Active Directory: Domain Services"). Azure AD is a separate identity provider -- to a first approximation it's HTTPS and cookies, not Kerberos, LDAP, and Ticket-Granting Tickets that we see on-prem.

> not Kerberos

Well... https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/azure-storage-blog/pu... :-)

Re: Does Company ‘X’ have an Azure Active Directory Tenant?

#157
post #125

What I can’t understand is why Azure AD doesn’t have a stronger position in the consumer space. Authentication via Google, Apple, and even still Facebook are nearly always supported on customer-facing logins. I rarely see an option for Microsoft. They have a commanding position in the enterprise. What’s keeping them from crossing those enterprise boundaries?

Only very recently Windows started requiring a MS account. I'd guess most people who don't own a Xbox don't have a MS account.

I was forced to use one to set up my new laptop

Re: Does Company ‘X’ have an Azure Active Directory Tenant?

#158

What I can’t understand is why Azure AD doesn’t have a stronger position in the consumer space. Authentication via Google, Apple, and even still Facebook are nearly always supported on customer-facing logins. I rarely see an option for Microsoft. They have a commanding position in the enterprise. What’s keeping them from crossing those enterprise boundaries?

Do enough people still use consumer Microsoft accounts? Except for myself, it has been a long time since I have encountered a hotmail address or live address or outlook address in the wild. I've gotten career advice several times to get a GMail instead, because Microsoft was considered out of date and backward (not so much anymore).

You can have a ms account but never use or know or share the ms email address associated with it

Re: Does Company ‘X’ have an Azure Active Directory Tenant?

#159
post #82
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I need to always give a password in Jira.

Jira, and the whole of Atlassian Cloud services, bundle SSO as a separate service you pay for. It's called Atlassian Access and it costs $4-$2 depending on number of users, so many companies skip it because it easily doubles your Jira/Confluece costs. sso.tax

Security tax

Re: Does Company ‘X’ have an Azure Active Directory Tenant?

#160
post #52

I know how we feel about the Microsoft Death Star consuming all in its path, but there are some upsides to statistics like this. For instance, we are a B2B software vendor in the banking space, and we have to survive all kinds of audits regarding the nature of our code & vendors. By keeping nearly all of our 3rd party items under the Microsoft umbrella, we can automagically skip over vast chunks of our due diligence…

No post body was provided.
Post reply on HN