Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also a permanent stain on Google's reputation.
Google has a responsibility, to a limited degree, to turn over to law enforcement anything that they know about abuse that comes through their system. More likely, the trigger for that is set really low as a corporate CYA and to pass the buck. I can totally see Google's point of view on this: We're providing a free* service to you, we're not going to stick our neck out and risk ANY liability of being blamed of storin…
A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
151–160 of 609 posts
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#152> Not only did he lose emails, contact information for friends and former colleagues, and documentation of his son’s first years of life, his Google Fi account shut down, meaning he had to get a new phone number with another carrier. Without access to his old phone number and email address, he couldn’t get the security codes he needed to sign in to other internet accounts, locking him out of much of his digital life.…
Moved where? Not to iCloud, I hope? Self-hosting mail, calendar and media is too complex task for 99% of population. This is not a solution.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#153> Not only did he lose emails, contact information for friends and former colleagues, and documentation of his son’s first years of life, his Google Fi account shut down, meaning he had to get a new phone number with another carrier. Without access to his old phone number and email address, he couldn’t get the security codes he needed to sign in to other internet accounts, locking him out of much of his digital life.…
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#154I’ve heard too many things about how non existent Google’s customer service is to ever trust them for anything critical. You hardly ever hear stories like this from any of the other big tech companies. I’m excluding FB, because I don’t care about FB enough.
You can get customer service from Google's hardware just like Apple.
It's the software/services that have awful/non-existent customer service.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#155GOOGLE EMPLOYEES: Quit your jobs and do something positive for the world for a change.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#156> Not only did he lose emails, contact information for friends and former colleagues, and documentation of his son’s first years of life, his Google Fi account shut down, meaning he had to get a new phone number with another carrier. Without access to his old phone number and email address, he couldn’t get the security codes he needed to sign in to other internet accounts, locking him out of much of his digital life.…
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#157I’ve heard too many things about how non existent Google’s customer service is to ever trust them for anything critical. You hardly ever hear stories like this from any of the other big tech companies. I’m excluding FB, because I don’t care about FB enough.
Can you name other big tech companies with good customer service that is purely software? You can get customer service from Google's hardware just like Apple. It's the software/services that have awful/non-existent customer service.
I can depend on Google to support a Google branded phone I bought in 2013 with security updates 8 years later like an iPhone 5s user could or with operating system updates for a phone I bought in 2015?
The original poster couldn’t get anyone on the line about a Google account. You can call an Apple CSR about an iCloud issue.
Re: A dad took photos of his toddler for a doctor – Google flagged him as a criminal
#158Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's literally capitalism. It's the system that Google was allowed to thrive in and become this powerful.
Power concentration is inevitable regardless of the system because in order to enforce decentralization you would need to, well, concentrate power. Our best bet is to shame those using products of unethical companies.
Plot twist: (maybe) Xyz is (not) an (un)ethical company, so we should establish some sort of authority on ethics with a malleable but firm framework to guide the consistent -- and proportional to the unethics in question -- application of shame to the people using the products.