Earlier quoted context omitted.
If a seatbelt doest stop you from dying in 100% of car crashes, I don't understand why they're mandatory?
Quoted post unavailable.
Unvaccinated workers who lose jobs ineligible for unemployment benefits (Canada)
151–160 of 600 posts
Re: Unvaccinated workers who lose jobs ineligible for unemployment benefits (Canada)
#152In other festive COVID news from Canada: >Canada's Justin Trudeau on the unvaccinated: >“They don’t believe in science/progress and are very often misogynistic and racist....This leads us, as a leader and as a country, to make a choice: Do we tolerate these people?" https://twitter.com/KevinBardosh/status/1476838517007257600 My patience with COVID cultists is starting to run quite thin.
There is no science if doubts aren’t allowed.
Re: Unvaccinated workers who lose jobs ineligible for unemployment benefits (Canada)
#153These vaccines have risks that are not being opening discussed. There is an unprecedented systematic campaign of censorship, deception and propaganda aimed at people who question anything about these vaccines. Vaccine injuries are real. The performance of these vaccines are not meeting expectations. They should not be mandated, full stop. We need a system based on informed consent, not coercion.
Re: Unvaccinated workers who lose jobs ineligible for unemployment benefits (Canada)
#154Re: Unvaccinated workers who lose jobs ineligible for unemployment benefits (Canada)
#155It seems we are heading in a direction where those who don't take the jab will be blocked from receiving government services, prevented from patronizing various businesses, and even restricted from traveling and the ability to work. Are most citizens really okay with this medical apartheid, or are they afraid of speaking out against it?
apartheid was a racist policy that discriminated against people based on their skin color… you’re comparing this to mandating a vaccine that dramatically reduces the hospitalization rate during an international pandemic that has killed more than 5 million people in 2 years
When administered to the at risk population. When required for young, hospitalization system impact would be marginal.
Re: Unvaccinated workers who lose jobs ineligible for unemployment benefits (Canada)
#156Quoted post unavailable.
Re: Unvaccinated workers who lose jobs ineligible for unemployment benefits (Canada)
#157It seems we are heading in a direction where those who don't take the jab will be blocked from receiving government services, prevented from patronizing various businesses, and even restricted from traveling and the ability to work. Are most citizens really okay with this medical apartheid, or are they afraid of speaking out against it?
I work for a major news organization in the US and am willing to lose my highly paid job to assert my rights. I desperately urge others who are also capable to take such a hit to follow suit. Edit: Note, I'm also vaccinated. J&J March 2020.
Re: Unvaccinated workers who lose jobs ineligible for unemployment benefits (Canada)
#158Earlier quoted context omitted.
If a seatbelt doest stop you from dying in 100% of car crashes, I don't understand why they're mandatory?
> If a seatbelt doest stop you from dying in 100% of car crashes, I don't understand why they're mandatory? Interestingly, your comparison is relevant, but you are responding to an argument which I don't think is being made. The OP is _not_ arguing that vaccines shouldn't be mandatory because they aren't 100% effective. On the contrary, the OP's argument is that since vaccines are relatively effective, one person's c…
If you're not seriously doing your part, then you are actively supporting the virus and working against all the rest of the population that is either unable to get critical care or just tirelessly working in the healthcare sector treating all those avoidable critical patients.
Re: Unvaccinated workers who lose jobs ineligible for unemployment benefits (Canada)
#159It seems we are heading in a direction where those who don't take the jab will be blocked from receiving government services, prevented from patronizing various businesses, and even restricted from traveling and the ability to work. Are most citizens really okay with this medical apartheid, or are they afraid of speaking out against it?
Quite the hyperbole: not all government services, just employment insurance and that too if you were only fired for not receiving the vaccine. A reminder that in many of these jobs, there was already a requirement for getting a set of vaccines so this is not new. Though for some people, this vaccine is "different" but once you ask them to explain why they can't. So no new rules. You needed vaccines for most of the jobs and this just an additional one.
You will still receive employment insurance for other stuff, irrespective of your vaccination status.
> prevented from patronizing various businesses
You are not prevented from accessing essential businesses and no one checks your vaccination status or even asks for one.
> even restricted from traveling and the ability to work
You are still free to drive to work or take local public transit.
The difference between ICU rates of unvaccinated and vaccinated people in Ontario for example tells us that the vaccination is working:
https://covid19-sciencetable.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/2...
^ Please see the above graph.
If you cannot participate in society moving forward, then you should not expect society to cater to your needs.