Live data from Hacker News

Read Fewer Books

theschooloflife.com

151–152 of 152 posts

Re: Read Fewer Books

#151
post #4

A book is a somewhat large time investment. Often it is worth it but often it isn't. The main problem is the sheer amount of books out there. Deciding what to read next is a non-trivial decision problem. Currently I'm basing my decisions on ratings, recommendations from friends and book clubs. It would be nice if sites like Goodreads kept statistics on ratings for second/third/... reading (maybe they do?). Such infor…

Whatever the intent of Goodreads initially, once Amazon bought it, it became a subtle funnel to drive sales of books, ideally through Amazon. While there are options there for libraries and many other booksellers, no one should believe for a minute that Bezos is interested in helping Goodreads be a contemplative site that fosters multiple readings of a small number of deeper reads. The reviews can be helpful, but “tr…

I think it all depends on how you use Goodreads. I used to use it to track how many books I read a year, participating in their challenges and stuff. I set one for 2020, but have since disregarded it thanks to browsing /r/bookscirclejerk, which convinced me deeper, wider reading was better than trying to do 52 books a year.

Since then, I've mainly just categorized books I've read on goodreads, which is nice if I want to see what I've read over the past few years and go back to some of them. Especially when my memory is quite bad. Often I'll rank them, though on a personal scale where 3 is 'enjoyed'. I might stop doing that soon, and just switch to an analog version my grandmother does -- write the book and authors in a notebook and keep for years. I've already starte doing this somewhat: I use an index card as a bookmark and write the book and completion date for whichever books I use it with.

Re: Read Fewer Books

#152

I'm not sure the article's title quite reflects its point, which is that the amount one reads is not by itself a very useful measure of anything; better to focus on what you're reading, why you're reading, and how you're reading. A better title might be: "The amount you read doesn't matter... as much as other factors" ... or something. Some random thoughts: 1) Indeed many nonfiction books are full of fluff and filler…

I'd definitely recommend How to Read a Book if you want to go into deeper reading. I haven't implemented it fully, though I'd really like to (need to buy a copy of How to Read a Book to be able to do that, so I can keep referencing it), but it's definitely made me do some short summaries of fluff books, which solidifies the concepts I needed to get out of them. It was useful for that, and I'd love to apply it in more depth.
Post reply on HN