Earlier quoted context omitted.
First, I was working as a consultant to work with organizations who off-shored there sys admin work. As a consultant I found myself having to document something step by step to the India counterparts. Why on earth does this make any sense to hire such people when I could simply do it myself? I've looked at the costs and they could hire one good on-site consultant for the price of 3 bad Indian ones. This is the age ol…
Well, I think we're looking at it from different angles. You see good outsourcing companies as those that have technically competent engineers. That's not how I see it. I think part of the reason big companies are still outsourcing to India is not because of the low cost of technical competence, but rather, the low cost of process management in developing IT-related software. For example, when you outsource a module…
So you might say that doing this sort of IT is akin to cargo cults: these organizations aren't really doing it, they're just pretending to themselves that they are.
So, if you're going to fail, why not fail as cheaply as possible?