Live data from Hacker News

U.S. wants the EU to accept chemical-washed chicken as part of trade deal

latimes.com

151–160 of 219 posts

Re: U.S. wants the EU to accept chemical-washed chicken as part of trade deal

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If the end result is unequivocally good... I think they'd argue "cleanliness" is not the only aspect of what "good" is. The chickens' diets and living conditions affect the quality of the chicken. To say nothing of the animal cruelty angle...

Then why focus on the chemical wash and not the actual problem people care about?

If they are allowed to use the wash, then they lose an incentive to improve their upstream practices.

Re: U.S. wants the EU to accept chemical-washed chicken as part of trade deal

#152
post #126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are comparing apples and oranges. The 142000 number is from chicken, alone. The 1.3 (or 1.2 at the top of the same wiki page you cite) is for all sources. There is a epidemiological problem here, of a) reported vs. estmated and b) the basis of both those things. But it isn't the one you thought it was.

The context of this thread is chicken, but thanks for noting that. But the point stands -- estimated infections cannot be compared with reported cases. If you can find actual reported cases in the US from all sources, that would be great to compare -- otherwise we shouldn't make the comparison at all.

Yes, we are pointing out the same epidemiological problem - I'm just noting your numbers don't support it compared that way.

Re: U.S. wants the EU to accept chemical-washed chicken as part of trade deal

#153
post #150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I understand it isn't the case everywhere, but slave labor in the US poultry industry is a thing: https://thinkprogress.org/the-hellish-conditions-facing-work...

Tyson is apparently not a great employer, but I'm not sure I would call that slave labor.

Apologies, I grabbed the wrong link. The one I meant to send is about a supplier for Tyson: https://www.truthdig.com/articles/thought-going-rehab-ended-...

Re: U.S. wants the EU to accept chemical-washed chicken as part of trade deal

#154
post #81
post #60

I remember when I visited a supermarket in the states and noticed something very weird: Not only chicken breast was super super cheap but the color was whiteish and didn't look right to me. Since a young age I visited egg farms and I can tell you the conditions are far from ideal, they even turn on the lights at 3am to enhance egg production. We're talking about egg farms that are regulated by EU laws. About 12 years…

>I remember when I visited a supermarket in the states and noticed something very weird: Not only chicken breast was super super cheap but the color was whiteish and didn't look right to me. Could it be woody breast? https://old.reddit.com/r/keto/comments/c9lbu3/psa_can_we_tal... https://www.wsj.com/articles/bigger-chickens-bring-a-tough-n...

The fat on American chickens is visibly whiter than those I've seen for sale from small local farms as well as the ones in Australia, which both tend to have a much deeper yellow to them.

I think that's a diet thing, though.

Woody breast tends to give a striated appearance to the meat.

Re: U.S. wants the EU to accept chemical-washed chicken as part of trade deal

#155
post #133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've heard that people in the US are discouraged from eating raw eggs. That makes it sound like the EU would be at greater risk, but if we the US doesn't do proper measurements we can pretend that it makes it impossible to even attempt to compare.

Eggs are a funny one, as the regulation is very different between US and EU. In the US all commercial eggs must be washed, which destroys the cuticle and is why eggs are stored in a fridge to keep fresh. In the EU commercial eggs cannot be washed, and are typically stored outside the fridge (and vaccinated against salmonella, iirc). There is a lot of contention about the effect on bacterial culturing, but research I'…

Turkey does best of all those, in regards to eggs: We have proper vaccination of chickens, eggs are not washed and eggs are always kept cold in stores (usually also at home).

Re: U.S. wants the EU to accept chemical-washed chicken as part of trade deal

#156
post #13

> Perdue on Monday defended [...] the technique to disinfect poultry [...], arguing that U.S. farmers now use a chemical called peracetic acid rather than chlorine: "Peracetic acid ... is a great pathogen reduction treatment. You know what it is? It's vinegar, essentially. To say that's unsafe or not to be used, we don't think there's a basis for that in sound science." I always thought the EU doesn't want this proce…

"sound science"

That's warning sign right there. It has a certain interpretation which is different from "good science". Quoting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junk_science#Use_as_corporate_...

> Theories more favorable to corporate activities are portrayed in words as "sound science." Past examples where "sound science" was used include the research into the toxicity of Alar, which was heavily criticized by antiregulatory advocates, and Herbert Needleman's research into low dose lead poisoning. ...

> According to epidemiologist David Michaels, Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environment, Safety, and Health in the Clinton Administration, the tobacco industry invented the "sound science" movement in the 1980s as part of their campaign against the regulation of second-hand smoke

Re: U.S. wants the EU to accept chemical-washed chicken as part of trade deal

#157
post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Having lived in Europe (UK, France) and North America (Canada) I can assure you that American chicken is not just as good. It's not just chicken. All sorts of meats are worse in quality.

>All sorts of meats are worse in quality. Well not really, especially when it comes to Beef. Pork has has a rather diverse selection from both side, but generally I think they are about the same.

I should clarify. It's not impossible to get higher quality meat but it's harder. I can go into almost any supermarket in the UK or France and get very high quality meat easily. I find that in Canada and the US it's much harder to find good quality meat in a supermarket. I have to go to more specialized places. Similarly the lower end in Canada and the US tends to be much lower than the lower end in the UK and France.

Don't even get me started on trying to get unsmoked ham but that's a cultural thing.

Re: U.S. wants the EU to accept chemical-washed chicken as part of trade deal

#158
post #128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The US has 450 deaths from Salmonella every year, the UK has had 1 in the last ten years. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salmonellosis_in_the_United_St...

That's because of mandatory salmonella immunization in the UK, it's not because of sanitary practices.

That's an even stronger argument against allowing US chicken to be imported.

Re: U.S. wants the EU to accept chemical-washed chicken as part of trade deal

#159
post #13

> Perdue on Monday defended [...] the technique to disinfect poultry [...], arguing that U.S. farmers now use a chemical called peracetic acid rather than chlorine: "Peracetic acid ... is a great pathogen reduction treatment. You know what it is? It's vinegar, essentially. To say that's unsafe or not to be used, we don't think there's a basis for that in sound science." I always thought the EU doesn't want this proce…

==It's vinegar, essentially. To say that's unsafe or not to be used, we don't think there's a basis for that in sound science.== Why aren't they just using vinegar if it's the same thing?

  Why aren't they just using vinegar if it's the same thing? 
Because it isn't the same thing, but they want to convey the idea (accurately or not) that it is benign to a general audience.

Re: U.S. wants the EU to accept chemical-washed chicken as part of trade deal

#160
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't want meat washed in vinegar, bleh. Maybe co-incidentally, that's how some supermarkets used to prolong the shelf life of meat once it started becomming smelly and sticky. Just washed it like that in vinegar, and re-packaged it. Like 20 years ago. Thanks but no thanks.

I might try that with meat that has started to go bad in my fridge. Seems like a good way to avoid waste.

Not sure if sarcasm or not, but please don't try that. You can use vinegar or other acidic marinades to prolong its edibility, but only before it has started to rot.
Post reply on HN