Live data from Hacker News

Technology Preview: Signal Private Group System

signal.org

151–153 of 153 posts

Re: Technology Preview: Signal Private Group System

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People don't like Telegram because it's a centralized thing and maybe not trustworthy. I'm not sure if I'd trust the Telegram founders, and their commitment to open source seems questionable to me (no server, outdated clients). People advocate for Signal because it's arguably the least offensive of the available e2e options. Also the founder for Signal has a long history of doing good work in this area.

> People don't like Telegram because it's a centralized thing and maybe not trustworthy. Just like Signal. > I'm not sure if I'd trust the Telegram founders, and their commitment to open source seems questionable to me Meanwhile Moxie Marlinspike's opposition to free software is evident. You use the client he dictates or fuck off. There's closed source software that respects freedom more than Signal.

https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android

Can't I build and use this if I want? It looks very open, but I haven't tried building my own client.

Re: Technology Preview: Signal Private Group System

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> People don't like Telegram because it's a centralized thing and maybe not trustworthy. Just like Signal. > I'm not sure if I'd trust the Telegram founders, and their commitment to open source seems questionable to me Meanwhile Moxie Marlinspike's opposition to free software is evident. You use the client he dictates or fuck off. There's closed source software that respects freedom more than Signal.

https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android Can't I build and use this if I want? It looks very open, but I haven't tried building my own client.

Free software is not about being able to compile and code Moxie Marlinspike allows you to use. It's about freedom that he opposes:

https://github.com/LibreSignal/LibreSignal/issues/37#issueco...

Yes, Signal's licensing complies to the letter of how we define free software. But that is irrelevant as it violates the spirit.

Post reply on HN