Live data from Hacker News

The Kindle is fine, but could’ve been much more

sixcolors.com

151–160 of 170 posts

Re: The Kindle is fine, but could’ve been much more

#151
> My Kindle could’ve been a hub for all of my reading, from newsletters to newspapers to subscription sites to books.

Seems that a Kobo and https://getpocket.com would be right up his alley.

(The recent Aura HD is a 300 dpi pocketable device comparable to the Kindle Paperwhite)

Re: The Kindle is fine, but could’ve been much more

#152
post #150
post #122

I was in the Kindle org when it was blowing up at Amazon. Started when there were a few dozen people in Seattle working on it, ended when there were a few thousand. They're right that it could've been more. Back in the early days, after the launch of the second version, many people internally saw this. If this works for books, it should work for magazines! Newspapers! Websites! Crosswords! Apps of all sorts! Social n…

Isn't eInk a bit like OLED, but way more ahead of our time? I think it's a cool technology, but probably needs more money/time to be general purpose.

With the recent customer desire of devices that are better at not sucking up our time & attention, eInk becomes an interesting technology. A few product attempts:

Light Phone: "dumb" phone (https://www.thelightphone.com)

Freewrite: word processors (https://getfreewrite.com)

reMarkable: notepad (https://remarkable.com)

Re: The Kindle is fine, but could’ve been much more

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

400 ppi :-)

Hm, supposedly even 600 ppi is coming: https://goodereader.com/blog/e-paper/will-we-see-500-or-600-... I guess this makes more of a difference for japanese characters or I just don't know yet what I am missing :-)

My scanner can be set to 300, 400, or 600 dpi. I find the 400 scans are just easier on the eyes, and the 600 makes no difference (or perhaps that's just my monitor).

Re: The Kindle is fine, but could’ve been much more

#154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd just like to be able to write apps for the remarkable. Even a free one.

You can! For example, I wrote an app launcher for the device which allows you to boot other programs, or the default interface.

I wrote to them and they told me it was not possible.

Re: The Kindle is fine, but could’ve been much more

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He’s suggesting it could be a really good newspaper and magazine reader as well, not that it should become an iPad.

A black and white reader isn't going to be a good newspaper or magazine reader. There are better devices for that. He also wished for an app store and that starts to sound a lot like wishing it become an iPad. That a Kindle is boring is a feature, not a problem. I don't pick up a Kindle for the Kindle-ness, it's for the books on it. With the right book, some days that boring Kindle is the device that I just can't put…

> A black and white reader isn't going to be a good newspaper or magazine reader.

Considering newspapers were black and white for hundreds of years, and for a long time printed color photos as black and white, this seems an odd conclusion.

Re: The Kindle is fine, but could’ve been much more

#156
post #100
post #5

I'm more of a fan of the Nook and Kobo series (ability to sideload DRM-less ePubs is non-negotiable). But I like the less-is-more approach for e-readers; if anything, I'd prefer they had even more spartan/minimalist UIs, mimicking the "zero UI" affordances of a physical book as much as possible. I'm just being finicky, but I still find the e-ink screen flash a little distracting from the flow of reading (even in newe…

So instead of a 5ms flash, you have to take 0.5s turn the device around? And have one more sensitive surface to care about? Personally I used to find the flash bothering at first, but now I actually set mine to full-refresh on every page change to totally avoid burn-in. It's not a worse distraction than physically turning a book page.

I'm pretty sure even the latest and greatest readers take longer than 5ms. ;) And the idea is to mimic the persistence of a physical object; flipping the reader over is roughly equivalent to turning a page. But I certainly wouldn't blame anyone for finding my preferences to be unreasonably nitpicky! :D

Re: The Kindle is fine, but could’ve been much more

#157
post #152
post #150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't eInk a bit like OLED, but way more ahead of our time? I think it's a cool technology, but probably needs more money/time to be general purpose.

With the recent customer desire of devices that are better at not sucking up our time & attention, eInk becomes an interesting technology. A few product attempts: Light Phone: "dumb" phone ( https://www.thelightphone.com ) Freewrite: word processors ( https://getfreewrite.com ) reMarkable: notepad ( https://remarkable.com )

I think the recent trend of anti-blue screens is something e-ink could get onto even more. A Kindle with a low colour temperature backlight that integrated well into something like Paper would be the perfect device to read HN on.

Re: The Kindle is fine, but could’ve been much more

#158
The Kindle's real failure is the lack of a bigger screen. For effective reading of Textbooks/Technical papers etc. a 10-13 inch screen is a must. They did start off with a 10 inch screen but have regressed to the current 6-7 inch format which are good only for the "popular" books.

The best would be to design a dual screen book-like device like the "Surface Neo/Duo" but with e-Ink display (preferably colour) and give me an easy and affordable way to download Technical papers/Textbooks (mainly in PDF format). Allow markup/annotations and the ability to print/export notes/everything and every Student/Teacher/Professor will buy one. Bonus if i can use it as a second monitor (ala Onyx Boox Max 2). No other distractions are needed. All the money goes into the display and giving me a complete immersive book-like experience.

Re: The Kindle is fine, but could’ve been much more

#159

The older generation of Kindles were nearly perfect devices. I have the last model that was not touchscreen and had the physical paddle buttons on both sides to turn pages, so you can easily read with either hand. It doesn't have a ton of storage, but you can fit hundreds of text-only .mobis in a GB. The battery lasts for weeks, with the wifi turned off. I'm not so impressed with the newer models. Switching to a touc…

Yeah, a touchscreen and an ereader are a match made in hell. Just try to hold the reader and swipe with the same hand. Reading with one hand on the Kindle Keyboard is great. You can stand in the security line with one hand on your luggage and the other reading the KK. I have no idea how the touch interface ever got through Amazon usability testing.

You don’t need to swipe, just tap the screen lightly and it turns the page. I often read my paper white one handed

Re: The Kindle is fine, but could’ve been much more

#160
post #109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Amazon even give them all a unique email address so you can just send it supported files as easy as emailing a file. PDFs can be converted to native format by putting "convert" in the subject line.

The send-to-kindle email is a nice feature which I wish other e-readers supported. The only other one I know of which supports it is PocketBook. https://www.mobileread.com/forums/showthread.php?t=247639 I've worked on a service which converts web articles and sends them to the Kindle using Amazon's send-to-kindle feature. If anyone wants to try it: https://pushtokindle.fivefilters.org

I love push to kindle, thank you :)

I've been using it for a while and it changed the way I read the web. I subscribe to RSS feeds with Feedly, then use p2k to send the ones I want to read. Then when I'm eating my lunch I can read interesting stuff without getting sucked into the temptation of aimless browsing, and on a nicer screen. An added bonus is that I don't get exposed to the cesspit of the comments section that seems to lurk at the bottom of every article these days :)

Post reply on HN