Live data from Hacker News

GitHub Package Registry

github.com

151–160 of 389 posts

Re: GitHub Package Registry

#151
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hey Microsoft, if you're listening, you should throw Sonatype or other Maven-related organizations a few bucks. They deserve it.

Just because Microsoft has a lot of money doesn't mean they can just throw it around. That's not how the world works...

They're literally throwing around money creating new coding tools, languages, buying GitHub, LinkedIn, ... if we were to debate the effectiveness of its spending, there would be a lot to talk about.

Re: GitHub Package Registry

#152
post #127
post #115

There's something slightly concerning about ceding responsibility for distributing the world's open-source projects from a family of strong independent repositories to a centralized platform owned by a tech giant.

Yes, but that's not a new concern - to some, GitHub has always represented an anathema to what git was supposed to be and bring. Centralization at a proprietary vendor, instead of open systems interacting. Then locking people in further by network effect and adding centralized products around git. That it's become so popular many people equate GitHub with git adds insult to injury. I completely understand why this al…

When Linus introduced git he didn't seem to care at all about decentralizing from a political standpoint, just from a "I can work on this from my laptop without an internet connection" point of view.

Re: GitHub Package Registry

#153
post #138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is still really unorganized in many ways. The worst thing, I think, is search results still frequently list obsolete MSDN pages higher...and, btw, the new branding is not MSDN, but docs.microsoft.com. They still have a long ways to go, with the typical problems of a large organization tackling a large, kind of amorphous, project.

docs.microsoft.com PM here - thanks for the feedback! It takes some time to update all our search results across the two major search engines. Given that some pages have less traction than others, the more obscure content sometimes still is indexed as if it's coming from MSDN. We have moved most of the library to docs, with redirects in place, so hopefully you won't get too many 404s. If you do - feel free to report…

Question: Why is Offline documentation and the Help Viewer in Visual Studio 2017 still horribly broken? I keep it around for when I don’t have internet access but it’s next to useless. Why keep up the pretence? (In comparison, the CHM and DocEx from VS6 through VS2008 work perfectly and are very reliable)

Re: GitHub Package Registry

#154
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hey Microsoft, if you're listening, you should throw Sonatype or other Maven-related organizations a few bucks. They deserve it.

Just because Microsoft has a lot of money doesn't mean they can just throw it around. That's not how the world works...

They bought Minecraft for 4 billion.

Re: GitHub Package Registry

#155

... looking forward to the Hacker News post in 4 years about how Github has really lost their way and how they're now super evil. Remember this when you guys all rush to sign up for their new services because it's easier for you now ;)

Meh, look at npm right now. I prefer this switch even if it means switching again in four or six years.

Re: GitHub Package Registry

#156
Thanks for sharing This Package Registry.. I am Dotnet Developer, and working for Coupon Sites and create so many sites

visual" rel="nofollow">http://www.visualstudioprofessionalpromocode.com">visual studio promo code office" rel="nofollow">http://www.office2019promocode.com">office 2019 promo code vmware" rel="nofollow">http://www.vmwarefusionpromocode.net">vmware promo code microsoft" rel="nofollow">http://www.micropromocodes.com">microsoft store promo code

Re: GitHub Package Registry

#157
Is centralization of open source a good thing for the world or not? This thread seems to be overwhelmingly positive. And in the end we all will be critisizing it if all package repositories will be handled by a single entity. And that entity that is being applauded here in this case happens to be the most valuable corporation in the world right now. Healthy skepticism seems to be a disappearing attribute in the tech world

Re: GitHub Package Registry

#158
Everyone, if a programming language you use already has a good package registry (like ruby has rubygems), I would be extremely wary about switching to github. Don't put all your eggs in a large company's basket.

Re: GitHub Package Registry

#159
post #84

This is pretty interesting. Github really is becoming the social network that MS never seemed to be able to create. We already use it as our portfolio of work for potential employers. We collaborate with fellow enthusiasts and maybe even make new friends. We host our websites from it. Abuse it to store binaries, too. And now, along side, source code we can use it as a CDN of sorts to serve packages, for free, sounds…

It's the social network for... function Ballmer() { while (true) { print("Developers!"); } }

You jest, but Microsoft seems to have really taken Ballmer's message to heart lately. Ballmer was on-the-nose about needing a strong developer community; he was just terribly misguided about how to actually get one going :)

Re: GitHub Package Registry

#160
post #117

I worry about npm now. The huge public registry everyone loves is run off investor's money and subsidized by npm's private registry product. But npm has recently changed their nice-people-matter CEO to a now-print-money dude, so I suspect investors' patience has run out. And now GitHub went directly after the one thing that npm is supposed to be making money on.

I suppose a less anxious view is that we just diversified away from the ecosystem risk from what was looking to be the start of an implosion of npm.
Post reply on HN