151–160 of 525 posts
Does anyone remember Interstellar. Their black hole simulation was based on hard science. Looks fairly similar
When interstellar came out wired did a full magazine spread on the movie, covering its science, how they came up with the story and what the director did to make sure it was believable. idk what it looks like online but I've kept the magazine.
A small thing. It could have been nice if the scientists didn't have commercial bottled water on stage. As an example to the world. Reusable personal containers would have been nice.
Does this confirm or disapprove Steven Hawking Black-hole radiation?
INT. EUROPEAN COMMISSION – PHONE RINGS
SAMARA
Seven days...Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does that image have a weird pulsing optical illusion for anyone else?
Yes, reminds me of the Eye of Sauron.
https://www.amazon.com/Superunknown-Soundgarden/dp/B00IXLQJ8...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's still no proof of existence of black holes. It's like saying that a lightning storm is proof of Thor, because the legends say he wields the very same lightning. The cause could be something entirely different (spontaneous spacetime ripples, alien generators, whatever really).
> It's still no proof of existence of black holes You've shifted the goal posts in this sentence. Previously, you said there was no evidence of black holes. Now you're upped the scale to demanding proof . The previous commenter wasn't claiming that LIGO detections were proof of black holes. They said that they were evidence of black holes. The LIGO detections, by all reasonable metrics, would certainly qualify as evi…
So we got an image of one in a far away galaxy before the one in the center of our own galaxy!
So we got an image of one in a far away galaxy before the one in the center of our own galaxy!
Higher resolution official release seems to be: https://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/blackholes/download...
Does that image have a weird pulsing optical illusion for anyone else?