Earlier quoted context omitted.
Technology carry its own intrinsic political and ethical weight. Choosing a tech over another tech for technical reasons and ignoring other aspects is a political choice.
I’m seriously kind of tired of this argument. We’ve gone from “not choosing is a choice” to “every choice is political”. I’m sorry but the latter doesn’t immediatly follow from the first. You can and are totally free to not use a technology or buy from a particular company for political reasons, but that does not mean that others are making a political choice when doing so. Similarly you should argue that eating meat…
That's why I use Firefox and not google chrome even though at some points one is better than the other.
> We’ve gone from “not choosing is a choice” to “every choice is political”.
> I’m sorry but the latter doesn’t immediatly follow from the first.
Nobody said or implied that.
> Similarly you should argue that eating meat is a religious choice, since some religions prohibit meat consumption.
Now that's a bogus reasoning and I don't see why you twist the analogy like that since it loses relevance.