I remember about a year or two ago, there was a lot of press on HN about a new Firefox engine that made it extremely fast. Ever since then, I've only seen negative comments about Firefox. Did that just not pan out as much as people had expected?
Firefox 65.0 released
151–160 of 422 posts
Re: Firefox 65.0 released
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
A scaled resolution is now default on most MacBooks. I haven't noticed battery problems but certainly seen RAM usage at least double that of Chrome and considerably above Safari.
If you are worried about battery performance, I can personally attest that Firefox is better than chrome in terms of battery performance. Still Safari is the best in terms of battery endurance (its a VERY SIGNIFICANT difference). But then again its Safari, so you have to decide whether you want a capable browser (FF/Chrome) or a battery efficient one.
Re: Firefox 65.0 released
#153Does anyone know what the decoding performance of AV1 is these days? I'd love to play with it, but back when I last tried my oldish laptop did NOT like decoding it.
dav1d is the state of the art currently, but i dont know if it's used by FF. https://code.videolan.org/videolan/dav1d
Re: Firefox 65.0 released
#154I remember about a year or two ago, there was a lot of press on HN about a new Firefox engine that made it extremely fast. Ever since then, I've only seen negative comments about Firefox. Did that just not pan out as much as people had expected?
Overall, still many reasons for people to be grumpy.
Re: Firefox 65.0 released
#1551. There’s still no full featured Tab Mix Plus possible with the current APIs. That’s been a big bummer for some years now.
2. The most downloaded session management extension now is still not as rich and good as the old XUL extension Session Manager (from mozdev).
3. I probably have to search again for a WebExtension equivalent for this one. Lazarus was a nice form saving extension in the past. Not sure if something similar exists or is even possible.
Re: Firefox 65.0 released
#156At the risk of a downvote storm, a few months ago I tried to switch from Chrome to Firefox until I had a call of two hours via Google Hangouts and Firefox started to degrade the voice until a point of no return. I don't know if this is common in very demanding "web apps".
Re: Firefox 65.0 released
#157Re: Firefox 65.0 released
#158Earlier quoted context omitted.
The pretense that all Linux users should be (or already are) technically capable is really harmful to the ecosystem. No, you should not expect Ubuntu or Debian users to figure out on their own (1) why the tar.gz file they download doesn't do anything meaningful and (2) how they will get this version of Firefox instead without any further instructions. Running Firefox from a tarball is a very specific use case for a s…
> No, you should not expect Ubuntu or Debian users to figure out on their own If someone knows what Debian is and has chosen to install it I think its fairly safe to assume they have some Linux knowledge. Ubuntu on the other hand is the most likely to work without any tweaking. Its the default choice for less technical people wanting to try Linux as well as more experienced people who want a hassle free install.
My argument is that even technical users, with the skill to install Debian [1] or far beyond, should not have to figure out this problem. Even if your users can figure out how to solve such problems, they shouldn't have to confront them with a thing to figure out if you don't need to.
The Linux ecosystem is so full of the attitude "oh well, my users can figure it out". It really annoys me, and it really holds stuff back.
[1] This really is not an amazing skill. I know plenty moderately computer literate people capable of getting through the straightforward Debian installer that are not up to date on Linux packaging systems. Just think of all the intermediately skilled Windows users looking to switch.
Re: Firefox 65.0 released
#159I feel like I've been waiting a long time for autoplay blocking - does this keep being pushed back or have I missed a feature cancellation/config setting/extension announcement?
Re: Firefox 65.0 released
#160Still waiting for vimperator so I can use browser like I used to use only 2 years back. Tridactyl is good but no :map, no :js and alphabets instead of numbers for links.
- :js is there
- You can have numbers with :set hintstyle numeric
- You can have Vimperator style link filtering with :set hintfiltermode vimperator
- There's no map (and probably never will be), but you can bind sequences of keys to "ex-commands", which is probably 99% of what you want, e.g, :bind t open google what time is it
The main problem I have with Tridactyl is that it's pretty janky at the moment.