i dunno, 4 free iphones is probably worth dealing with glitter and fart spray for a few minutes?
I don't think money was the concern here. The guy seems pretty well off.
Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves
151–160 of 940 posts
Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves
#152Anyone else found it unsatisfactory that there was nothing about forwarding the footage of the thieves to the police?
Yeah. “Hello officer, I made a booby trapped package and I...” gets tased “argh no you don’t under- “ is handed off to the secret service I doubt the cops would look kindly on what is at best (funny) vigilante justice, at worse a violation of some federal law.
Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves
#153Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fart spray and glitter are temporary and relatively harmless. Permanent dye in someone's home are car is just being a jerk.
We sure wouldn't want to upset people stealing our belongings.
Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves
#154Do you think the bomb maker could be held liable if the package were to be opened in a moving car that subsequently crashed because of glitter getting in the driver's eyes? I'd be a little nervous about doing this myself.
Just label the box with "DO NOT TAKE IN A CAR"
Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves
#155In the Netherlands, when I order a package and no one's at home when it's delivered, it either gets delivered to my neighbors or to the post office, with a note of where to pick it up. It's never left at my door AFAIK. How is this not an option in the US?
Overall the rate of package theft is low though, so people prefer the convenience and low cost of normal package delivery.
The US is big and diverse. Most areas have little to no package theft. However, if your home has a very exposed front porch and you live in an affluent area very near a not so affluent area, theft can be more of an issue.
Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves
#156Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've had the same thought when I first saw it. Some suspicious things: thieves talking to themselves, that lady throwing the box into her own garbage bin, zero attempt at disassembly or closer inspection of the box, no police involved. Also GPS is just not that good for locating anything of that size in given circumstances, and it would not have worked in the parking garage. Too many things could have gone wrong here…
>Too many things could have gone wrong here, but they did not. The design is subpar in my opinion, for somebody who worked on a Mars rover. Custom printed board plus a bunch of smartphones, seriously? What would you propose? The best design is often the easiest/cheapest one, and this looks like pretty simple.
There are ready made cheap boards with identical functionality to a cellphone, few dollars a pop. And yes, they run Android.
That said, this way he can claim it had something valuable inside in case it is still taken.
Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves
#157What are people's thoughts on if this is staged? Considering the views / subscriptions are the main motivation here, it might justify the expenses poured into this project – that is, it would be quite a waste if all that effort went into the build just to have no one actually take it off the porch. If actors were used, it would explain the lack of police involvement (it's easy to say, "police weren't interested" ). A…
I seriously doubt that andy sane person would glitter and stink bomb their own car.
I don't think the video is fake, though.
Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves
#158What are people's thoughts on if this is staged? Considering the views / subscriptions are the main motivation here, it might justify the expenses poured into this project – that is, it would be quite a waste if all that effort went into the build just to have no one actually take it off the porch. If actors were used, it would explain the lack of police involvement (it's easy to say, "police weren't interested" ). A…
I've had the same thought when I first saw it. Some suspicious things: thieves talking to themselves, that lady throwing the box into her own garbage bin, zero attempt at disassembly or closer inspection of the box, no police involved. Also GPS is just not that good for locating anything of that size in given circumstances, and it would not have worked in the parking garage. Too many things could have gone wrong here…
Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
Given the police's complete inaction vigilantism was inevitable. I wonder if an industry of decoy packages will spring up, maybe "sticky" or "smelly" glitter. Or heck just go full ink bomb. I wonder where the law stands on this? Can you really be liable if someone steals your property then causes property damage using it?
> Given the police's complete inaction vigilantism was inevitable. This makes me wonder: who is responsible for the lost package? I would expect, if the deliverer can't prove they delivered the package (because they didn't get a signature), they're responsible for the loss and need to pay for the loss. The recipient certainly can't help that someone left a package outside. If the loss is for the recipient, then I can…
Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves
#160i dunno, 4 free iphones is probably worth dealing with glitter and fart spray for a few minutes?
Watch the video. The phones are hidden, and the fart spray is designed to make the thief get rid of the package as quickly as possible rather than taking it apart to see what might be inside.