Live data from Hacker News

How Manhattan Became a Rich Ghost Town

theatlantic.com

151–153 of 153 posts

Re: How Manhattan Became a Rich Ghost Town

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The turnaround of restaurants and bars here is amazingly fast. When one fails, another one springs up. The same street will have very different storefronts each year. Is that supposed to be a positive thing? Sounds pretty unstable and a terrible detriment to developing an actual neighbourhood.

Not generally. The good stuff will stick around. The stuff that isn’t as good wont. Most cities are about change, and while nostalgia is great, cities that look the same as they did 20 years previously usually are not successful cities. The reason is simple. Cities tend to attract younger folks. As the generation of people they attract changes, the tastes they need to cater to also changes.

> Not generally. The good stuff will stick around. The stuff that isn’t as good wont.

Only to the extent that good and profitable overlap.

Re: How Manhattan Became a Rich Ghost Town

#153
post #150
post #144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On a technical level: depends on how you're defining consumerism. See: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/consumerism https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/consumer-goods.asp At a deeper level: research has shown that spending money on experiences enriches your life far more than spending money on "things". That's what I'm referring to. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-02-28/why-you-s...

"Consume" literally means "eat". So eating out is definitely consumerism.

By your definition, I guess any caveman who didn't go on a hunger strike, was living up the consumerist lifestyle
Post reply on HN