Live data from Hacker News

Our path to listing SEC-regulated crypto securities

blog.coinbase.com

151–156 of 156 posts

Re: Our path to listing SEC-regulated crypto securities

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Presumably the part where you fraudulently faked KYC stuff.

So a checkbox or screenshot for KYC is going to fly with the SEC? They aren't going to go after retail investors.

If the crux of your plan is, "We're going to lie to the federal government about what we're doing, and hope that we're small enough that no one notices," you've got a pretty big flaw in your plan.

Re: Our path to listing SEC-regulated crypto securities

#152
post #150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're missing the point. Blockchain tokens are worse than centralized alternatives in most ways, so if the integrity of a financial security is codified through law then there is no need to pay the expensive costs to also have it codified as a blockchain token, especially because the law is the ultimate arbiter of the security's qualities and capabilities not a blockchain. A blockchain is useful when it can establis…

There is not much that is centralized about "the law", and "the law" isn't really a mechanism for modeling and trading securities. To some extent, by the same logic, the Internet is inherently a centralized platform (because it's governed by law as well) and would therefore be better if replaced by AOL. I looked at your comment history and it seems you are assuming that people with a so called "pro blockchain" angle…

> There is not much that is centralized about "the law"

Perhaps, but the SEC is pretty centralized, when two people can't come to an agreement then securities law enforced by the legal system determines the outcome of the dispute not smart-contract rules enforced by blockchain consensus.

> * I assure you not everyone in the space is an idiot, and you might be missing some points yourself.*

I don't think they're idiots, I think they're financially and emotionally invested in a fascinating technology that's not very useful. I don't think anything is wrong with that, and maybe one day I'll be proven wrong, but I have worked in this space (backend engineer for an exchange) and continue to follow it closely but skeptically and with good reason if you're intellectually honest about the track record of this industry.

Re: Our path to listing SEC-regulated crypto securities

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So a checkbox or screenshot for KYC is going to fly with the SEC? They aren't going to go after retail investors.

If the crux of your plan is, "We're going to lie to the federal government about what we're doing, and hope that we're small enough that no one notices," you've got a pretty big flaw in your plan.

Who is talking about lying to the government? You are misrepresenting what I am saying.

Re: Our path to listing SEC-regulated crypto securities

#154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So a checkbox or screenshot for KYC is going to fly with the SEC? They aren't going to go after retail investors.

> They aren't going to go after retail investors I work in the securities business. We once had someone send in a suspected altered document. Their state AG was notified, the U.S. Treasury and Homeland Security were notified, the SEC and FINRA were notified, and then we got some questions from Interpol, in Europe, and the UK's financial crimes investigator (through federal law enforcement). Fraudulently opening a sec…

Do you let customers open up an account without a social security number and a screenshot as proof of identity and KYC? You are uninformed about this industry.

Re: Our path to listing SEC-regulated crypto securities

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What are you referring to as fraud?

Faking KYC is fraud. Doing it to open a securities account is securities fraud. E-mailing it is wire fraud. Et cetera .

And speeding is against the law as well. Is HN bible club now?

Re: Our path to listing SEC-regulated crypto securities

#156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gab and it's crowd are quite abhorrent, but I don't think most people here are going to care about the mention that they're trying to do a token.

He was kicked out of HN. You underestimate how petty the mods here can be.

I don't think kicking the guy behind "Twitter, but for White Supremacists" is petty. But I also don't think that the mere mention that they're doing a token in a comment is going to be that harshly dealt with.
Post reply on HN