Live data from Hacker News

A Glimpse into the Bureaucratic Hell of Denying Health Insurance Claims

splinternews.com

151–160 of 211 posts

Re: A Glimpse into the Bureaucratic Hell of Denying Health Insurance Claims

#151
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So there's a lower bound on how much you can make and still get the subsidized plan? that seems broken in a very American sort of way. I think a lot of the bureaucratic issues might be the nature of insurance companies? My (pre-aca) experience was that any lapse in coverage and they don't let you back on. All this 'life event' stuff, I think, was part of how group plans worked back in the day, the rules about when yo…

There is a lower bound on income to qualify for ACA subsidies because the ACA also expanded medicaid to cover people below that threshold. Unfortunately, the portion of the ACA requiring states to expand medicaid was ruled unconstitutional. As a result, 19 states have choosen not to expand medicaid, leaving a portion of the population to poor to qualify for ACA subsidies, but too rich to qualify for medicaid. I shoul…

Am I right in thinking this is uniquely American? The states that need welfare the most seem to be most strongly against said welfare, even when the more wealthy states are footing most of the bill.

Re: A Glimpse into the Bureaucratic Hell of Denying Health Insurance Claims

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>pressure on hospitals to reduce prices Elsewhere it has been said: choosing between bankruptcy for your family or cancer care for your child isn't an actual choice, it's two loaded guns pointed at your skull. One held by the hospital, the other by the insurance company. The reason first world countries choose universal healthcare is that healthcare is a human right. Full stop. It is not an economic issue. If you wan…

I'm not sure its fair to argue that universal healthcare is a human right despite the fact it makes economic sense. Humanity survived just fine without real healthcare and healthcare is not essential to a fair balance of power b/t the government and its citizenry. Universal healthcare needs to be argued on the economics of the issue because that is the only practical way to make it sustainable. The "feel good" stuff…

You also have to watch out that asserting positive rights that are sometimes impossible to provide (like healthcare) will confuse people when governments attempt to claim that other, deeper rights are "impossible to give." (For example, they might try to argue that they can't afford to not torture, comparing it to how their impoverished country can't give everyone free internet.)

Re: A Glimpse into the Bureaucratic Hell of Denying Health Insurance Claims

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You have a young family of four, and can barely afford insurance premiums. Basically, without insurance, every single year you're hitting on a blackjack 17 against bankruptcy. You see the ACA penalty, and you see the insurance premium cost, but you're not factoring in the 5-digit cost of virtually any significant medical expense. Rising insurance premiums aren't good for anyone. The ACA set out to fix the problem of…

If enough people didn't have access to insurance, then there would be pressure on hospitals to find ways to reduce prices (so that their volume could go up). As it stands the medical industry is allowed to hold the poor for ransom ("accept our increased costs or they won't get treated") against the US's deep but finite pockets. Before, we had the (very poor) demand elasticity of people paying everything they had and…

How can you knowingly discuss demand elasticity and then apply to healthcare?

Healthcare is a non typical market and the cost of a persons health is irrationally high to that person.

Re: A Glimpse into the Bureaucratic Hell of Denying Health Insurance Claims

#154
post #14

If you're a tech entrepreneur, it's the first story in here that should alarm you the most. It's about denying coverage altogether, not about denying individual claims. Outside of the "guaranteed issue" ACA market, there is virtually no due process for coverage denial. You can be denied on a whim, with little recourse. The list of conditions for which insurance outside the ACA will be denied is long and opaque. The s…

How can you even live under these conditions? Are Americans really that different from the rest of the western world that you are fine with this?

Re: A Glimpse into the Bureaucratic Hell of Denying Health Insurance Claims

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>pressure on hospitals to reduce prices Elsewhere it has been said: choosing between bankruptcy for your family or cancer care for your child isn't an actual choice, it's two loaded guns pointed at your skull. One held by the hospital, the other by the insurance company. The reason first world countries choose universal healthcare is that healthcare is a human right. Full stop. It is not an economic issue. If you wan…

I'm not sure its fair to argue that universal healthcare is a human right despite the fact it makes economic sense. Humanity survived just fine without real healthcare and healthcare is not essential to a fair balance of power b/t the government and its citizenry. Universal healthcare needs to be argued on the economics of the issue because that is the only practical way to make it sustainable. The "feel good" stuff…

Healthcare is not hard. American healthcare is.

Frankly a single payer system is simpler and faster. But this is an area where American politics and market rhetoric just lead to terrible outcomes.

Re: A Glimpse into the Bureaucratic Hell of Denying Health Insurance Claims

#156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If enough people didn't have access to insurance, then there would be pressure on hospitals to find ways to reduce prices (so that their volume could go up). As it stands the medical industry is allowed to hold the poor for ransom ("accept our increased costs or they won't get treated") against the US's deep but finite pockets. Before, we had the (very poor) demand elasticity of people paying everything they had and…

How can you knowingly discuss demand elasticity and then apply to healthcare? Healthcare is a non typical market and the cost of a persons health is irrationally high to that person.

[deleted]

Re: A Glimpse into the Bureaucratic Hell of Denying Health Insurance Claims

#157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My own personal "why I hate the ACA"... In 2016, I decided to take off from work and travel outside the US. I did what I thought was the responsible thing and purchased a travel insurance plan. In total, I was gone for a year...I had an amazing trip. When I got home, I wanted to sign up for insurance again. But since it wasn't a life event, I wasn't eligible to enroll until the open enrollment period. And when that t…

If your income was zero, couldn't you have gone on Medicaid?

Not necessarily, depends on the state. Texas for instance has no adult medicaid.

Re: A Glimpse into the Bureaucratic Hell of Denying Health Insurance Claims

#158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If enough people didn't have access to insurance, then there would be pressure on hospitals to find ways to reduce prices (so that their volume could go up). As it stands the medical industry is allowed to hold the poor for ransom ("accept our increased costs or they won't get treated") against the US's deep but finite pockets. Before, we had the (very poor) demand elasticity of people paying everything they had and…

How can you knowingly discuss demand elasticity and then apply to healthcare? Healthcare is a non typical market and the cost of a persons health is irrationally high to that person.

Think about this:

Everyone on a boat has twenty dollars and absolutely needs an EpiPen to live. You have a supply of EpiPens and want to get as much of their money as possible. There's zero elasticity between 0 and 20 dollars, but you better not charge $21!

Now, imagine that there was only one person who needed an EpiPen, but everyone else was willing to pitch in as much as it took to help them out. If the supplier of the medicine was perfectly evil, the price would be $20 times the number of people.

Perfect self-interest is a pretty good model of any industry, including pharma, so I think this is a good picture of the situation. The ACA was careful to keep something like a market system in place, which is why we're faced with a problem that can be understood with microeconomics.

Re: A Glimpse into the Bureaucratic Hell of Denying Health Insurance Claims

#159
post #14

If you're a tech entrepreneur, it's the first story in here that should alarm you the most. It's about denying coverage altogether, not about denying individual claims. Outside of the "guaranteed issue" ACA market, there is virtually no due process for coverage denial. You can be denied on a whim, with little recourse. The list of conditions for which insurance outside the ACA will be denied is long and opaque. The s…

ACA is horrendous, unless you're receiving a government subsidy. I'm self-employed and we have one option of insurance provider, and the cheapest plan for my family last year was $18,000 a year with a huge deductible. That's after tax, out of pocket, for a healthy family with no pre-existing. Like all self-employed people I know (who aren't getting government subsidy), I moved my family to Christian Medishare, which…

> That's after tax, out of pocket, for a healthy family with no pre-existing.

And once you get a condition, you will get NO insurance without the ACA.

And we will all get a condition--it's called age.

Re: A Glimpse into the Bureaucratic Hell of Denying Health Insurance Claims

#160
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The rate of increase for health insurance prices went down after the ACA was enacted. The motivation for enacting the ACA was, in large part, the untenable increase in insurance prices in the 10 years leading up to it. People have a bad habit of blaming the ACA for insurance prices. The ACA failed at its goal of making individual health insurance affordable, that is true. But it didn't cause that problem, and it did…

Health insurance for my healthy young family of 4 spiraled out of control WITH ACA, so much so that I didn’t purchase proper health insurance in 2017, while also underfunding my income tax in hopes that ACA cannot legally “send me a bill” for 2.5% of my household income. (I mean shit, in a red blooded patriotic American, but that penalty made me absolutely furious) All this while paying cash for prenatal visits for o…

You are taking a huge, basically unlimited risk with your now healthy family. And note that you will probably save at least as much by the discounts you get through the insurance company's networks as by how much insurance pays vs. patient. Example, had a covered but elective heart procedure. Insurance was billed around $220,000. But they got the hospital and doctors to accept less than $20,000. Yes, I paid some of that - but you see it's all in the under 10% part of the bill. Good luck negotiating your bill down 90% on your own.
Post reply on HN