Live data from Hacker News

Leonardo Da Vinci Painting Sells for $450.3M, Shattering Auction Records

nytimes.com

151–152 of 152 posts

Re: Leonardo Da Vinci Painting Sells for $450.3M, Shattering Auction Records

#151
post #102
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>For some people, buying art aren't isn't too different from buying stocks You are making it look like there's no emotion involved. Buying art in my opinion is mostly an emotional one, unless you're lucky and getting a Monet in a yard sale (which you admit by saying 'you can't do anything to enjoy equities hanging on your wall.'). Also, it is definitely not a logical rationale like buying stocks. Atleast not a stable…

There is centuries of data about how this asset has appreciated. It has a brand that has endured 500 years. Most of the stocks you will invest in, probably won't exist in 50. What could you possibly want to diversify against? It has outlasted Governments, new technologies, and new ideologies. Diversification is a durability strategy and this painting has proven durability across a multitude of change.

>Most of the stocks you will invest in, probably won't exist in 50.

I wasn't just talking about stocks. There are so many other places to invest with that amount of money.

Re: Leonardo Da Vinci Painting Sells for $450.3M, Shattering Auction Records

#152
post #77
post #59

What is interesting is that if this painting was attributed to someone unknown, its price would have fallen off the cliff even though there would have been zero material change in goods that buyer would be receiving. This says a lot about our hero worship tendencies. People are going to look very hard to see what is so special about this painting.

> This says a lot about our hero worship tendencies. Does it? Or does it say more about its value as being incredibly rare, and one of only a few Leonardi paintings. You understanding the value of scarcity right?

Scarcity from hero :)
Post reply on HN