Live data from Hacker News

Jacquard by Google transforms clothing

atap.google.com

151–160 of 168 posts

Re: Jacquard by Google transforms clothing

#151
post #138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

2040 startup idea: body-identity-based micro-credit. "You forgot your wallet, but you look fairly legit. For a 5% surcharge, we'll give you that coffee now. Pay this IOU online later. In case of nonpayment, you consent to nationwide tracking by our network of facial recognition drones."

... which sounds pretty close to Amazon's idea. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/amazon-go-grocery-store_...

Cool, but the Amazon Go store relies on you authenticating yourself (and presumably paying) via an app.

Do you think they contemplated doing visual ID of the shopper, or would it just be too creepy to walk into the store and have it say "Hello Dave, I'll put it all on your tab!"

Re: Jacquard by Google transforms clothing

#155
post #61
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you seen how many silly versions of bicycles and airplanes we got in the early 1900s? Suicide doors on cars and funny little wings on the back? Things take a while to converge.

Suicide doors are back, with auto locking

BMW i3? What other vehicles?

Re: Jacquard by Google transforms clothing

#156

Isn't cycling/driving with earphone plugged dangerous? I've tried it, and I couldn't hear the ambience sounds surrounding me.

I would think so. It's actually illegal in my state(PA) to wear headphones while driving. Not sure about bikes though.

How does PA square this against (in e.g. a rented car) the alternative for many folks is putting the phone to the ear... seems like a stale law.

Not all cars/phones/media can do handsfree.

Re: Jacquard by Google transforms clothing

#157
post #133

This may be the worst, least informative technology website I've ever seen – and that is a high (low?) bar. It fails the "what is it?" test with spectacular aplomb. And never have I learned less from a "learn more" page. “Music should keep you moving, not make you look at your phone.” Um, yeah, ok, thanks for that helpful information.

For a moment, I wondered if it was the 1st of April.

If they had included a video of ordering a pizza by rubbing one's tummy I think you'd be on to something there.

Re: Jacquard by Google transforms clothing

#159
post #45

Why get this denim jacket when you can get an iPhone and an Apple Watch? Jacquard only puts limits on you as it's stuck on that specific denim jacket. Apple Watch on the other hand works with any jacket. You don't even need a jacket with Apple watch, you can wear whatever you want, whenever you want, and it would still work compared to Jacquard which wouldn't.

Ideally clothing can use your back and stomach as a haptic surface. This offers directional feedback and more channels (an upper and lower feedback band, minimally). It also offers more natural touch surfaces. Indie folks have been doing this for years, and it's getting quite small. Interested parties are both homebrew hackers and folks working at improving the lives of sensory impairment.

Talk about visceral inputs. What about connected small clothes? When that person who swiped you on tinder will give you a nice little buzz in the right place.

Re: Jacquard by Google transforms clothing

#160

"The Jacket is designed to withstand up to 10 washes with the Jacquard snap tag removed but your experience may vary by usage and wash conditions" "Note: You can wear the Jacket in the rain, but if the Jacket becomes too wet it may not reliably detect gestures. Allow the Jacket to dry and resume using. The snap tag is resistant to rain and splashing, but it is not fully waterproof" Sure it's really "Specifically tail…

Is this really any worse than a denim jacket? I have a levi's jacket and I've never washed it. It's gotten rained on once or twice but I just dry it off. I also believe denim is anti microbial? Honestly, I only wash my jeans once they've had something spilled on them.

Are you serious about not washing your jeans regularly? I have skipped a couple of weeks on lightly worn pants, but default is definitely to keep it in the wash cycle...
Post reply on HN