This is a terrifying manifestation of what technology makes trivially possible. This device: * Logs every app and web page that you open. * Keeps forensics on shared files based on hashes, to track networks of like-minded dissidents or individuals sharing similar files. * Refuses to open any files which are not signed by either the government, or the device which created the file. (e.g. photos can be viewed only on t…
So, basically Android? Except, you don't get shot in the back. With Android, it automatically syncs Contacts and photos to the "Cloud", unless you disable it. But, you cannot do it 100%, because it's turn on by default when you first sign in. Also, it's not a secret that Google logs your locations history.
A Closer Look at North Korea’s Ullim Tablet
151–160 of 177 posts
Re: A Closer Look at North Korea’s Ullim Tablet
#152Earlier quoted context omitted.
Particularly when it's not even true. The Japanese wanted to surrender long before the Bomb was dropped, on condition that the Emperor remain in place. The US insisted on unconditional surrender, prolonging the fighting and resulting in the atom bomb attacks, then ended up accepting the Japanese condition anyway.
> then ended up accepting the Japanese condition anyway What?? Japan was forced to accept Allies' condition.
After rejecting that, thus prolonging the war and using the atom bombs, the US ended up keeping the Emperor in place (ie accepting the previous Japanese condition) anyway.
Re: A Closer Look at North Korea’s Ullim Tablet
#153The one good, albeit tragic, thing about the existence of North Korea is that it serves as a constant reminder of what society can become if we're not vigilant about educating each generation about the dangers of certain ideologies and modes of social organization.
There is more to it than that though, what do the North Koreans actually want? They want a federal Korea with two systems, two leaders, united as one country and with a seat at the U.N. for that one country. A united Korea would be a true world power within a generation, with GDP and population that would outshine all but one of the security council permanent members. None of the North's weapons point at the South, I…
Edit: After reading the wikipedia article on Korea reunification (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_reunification), I start to wonder why both countries are not actively pursuing this goal that is obviously beneficial to both now. Maybe some details are missing from the wiki article?
Re: A Closer Look at North Korea’s Ullim Tablet
#154Earlier quoted context omitted.
> then ended up accepting the Japanese condition anyway What?? Japan was forced to accept Allies' condition.
As I said in my post, the essential Japanese condition for surrender was that the Emperor remain in place. After rejecting that, thus prolonging the war and using the atom bombs, the US ended up keeping the Emperor in place (ie accepting the previous Japanese condition) anyway.
Re: A Closer Look at North Korea’s Ullim Tablet
#155Earlier quoted context omitted.
>The Japanese has plenty of opportunities to surrender but they kept fighting and fighting and fighting. It's odd how this is portrayed as a negative aspect of Japan's militarism, when the Allies were fighting the same war with the same attitude.
> It's odd how this is portrayed as a negative aspect of Japan's militarism, when the Allies were fighting the same war with the same attitude. That's not the point, obviously. The point is Japan's militarism combined with their utter over-the-top brutality and expansionist agenda.
Everything Japan learned about Imperialism it learned from the West, though. The Empire of Japan may have been brutal, but the Allies were hardly angels in comparison, or lacking in their own expansionist ideals.
Re: A Closer Look at North Korea’s Ullim Tablet
#156Earlier quoted context omitted.
As I said in my post, the essential Japanese condition for surrender was that the Emperor remain in place. After rejecting that, thus prolonging the war and using the atom bombs, the US ended up keeping the Emperor in place (ie accepting the previous Japanese condition) anyway.
I may be wrong, but I believe the Japanese wanted the Emperor to remain in place and retain his power - the US was merely willing to not kill him as long as he remained a figurehead and publicly renounced any claims to authority.
Re: A Closer Look at North Korea’s Ullim Tablet
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It's odd how this is portrayed as a negative aspect of Japan's militarism, when the Allies were fighting the same war with the same attitude. That's not the point, obviously. The point is Japan's militarism combined with their utter over-the-top brutality and expansionist agenda.
> The point is Japan's militarism combined with their utter over-the-top brutality and expansionist agenda. Everything Japan learned about Imperialism it learned from the West, though. The Empire of Japan may have been brutal, but the Allies were hardly angels in comparison, or lacking in their own expansionist ideals.
Well quite. How was Japan able to attack "the USA" (itself established by over-the-top brutality and expansionism) in the first place? Because the US had earlier overthrown, occupied, suppressed and militarised territories that are actually closer to Tokyo than Washington DC.
How dare some Asian country think it could colonise Asia, when Asia belongs to the US and Europe.
Re: A Closer Look at North Korea’s Ullim Tablet
#158Re: A Closer Look at North Korea’s Ullim Tablet
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
How can you even say that when you are replying to a comment talking about totalitarian regimes like nazi germany? This is one of those horrible "im more cartoonishly pessimistic ergo realistic than you" internet ideas.
Can you really maintain such ignorance in the face of the political reality, that governments gain no powers from the ether but rather - directly - from the support of their civilian populations? Are you stupid, or just young and haven't gotten to that part in civics lessons yet?
Re: A Closer Look at North Korea’s Ullim Tablet
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
From whom do governments gain power? (Hint: its not banks..)
That's over-simplification on a monumental scale. Governments and societies aren't 1-1 mappings of each other. You shouldn't mistake one as the other. And even if you do, it still doesn't take much thinking to ask: What about children?