Does anyone actually have any problems with Thunderbird? I feel like it is "done" software. It works, perfectly, for all my needs. It's fast. It has great UI. It lets me read and write email.
The search is unusable -- wedding finds 'weds'. There is no way to do exact searching. I reported this 5 years ago, lots of other people have complained about the stemming, there has been no fix. There is no support for outlook/exchange. Not saying it's trivial, but it's useful in the modern era. IMAP folder support is very flakey, I reported some bugs but nothing got fixed.
Proposal to start a new implementation of Thunderbird based on web technologies
151–160 of 243 posts
Re: Proposal to start a new implementation of Thunderbird based on web technologies
#152Does anyone actually have any problems with Thunderbird? I feel like it is "done" software. It works, perfectly, for all my needs. It's fast. It has great UI. It lets me read and write email.
I consider this almost a deal-breaker. It's such a simple theory that just about every other GUI MUA gets right.
Re: Proposal to start a new implementation of Thunderbird based on web technologies
#153Does anyone actually have any problems with Thunderbird? I feel like it is "done" software. It works, perfectly, for all my needs. It's fast. It has great UI. It lets me read and write email.
The search is unusable -- wedding finds 'weds'. There is no way to do exact searching. I reported this 5 years ago, lots of other people have complained about the stemming, there has been no fix. There is no support for outlook/exchange. Not saying it's trivial, but it's useful in the modern era. IMAP folder support is very flakey, I reported some bugs but nothing got fixed.
The search is really weird. I had to install an extension to always filter by date but even then it's broken to the point where I have to open webmail to do real searches.
[0]: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/thunderbird/addon/exquilla-...
Re: Proposal to start a new implementation of Thunderbird based on web technologies
#154Earlier quoted context omitted.
> My main Thunderbird toolbar has get mail, write new message and quick filtering. It took me perhaps 10 seconds back when I first installed it on this computer to hide a couple of other buttons like chat that I don't use myself. That's not how it works. The authors have to take the time to study the situation, talk about it, make hard decisions and cut out features that are useless or barely useful, and have the bal…
The authors have to take the time to study the situation, talk about it, make hard decisions and cut out features that are useless or barely useful, and have the balls to ship a product with just the right features instead of all the features in an attempt to please everyone. Not the user. You're perfectly entitled to that view, and for someone who holds that view a product like Thunderbird is obviously not a good fi…
We have opposite views.
Of course I only talk about personal preference, I'm aware that not everyone sees things the same way I do.
Re: Proposal to start a new implementation of Thunderbird based on web technologies
#155Earlier quoted context omitted.
The search is unusable -- wedding finds 'weds'. There is no way to do exact searching. I reported this 5 years ago, lots of other people have complained about the stemming, there has been no fix. There is no support for outlook/exchange. Not saying it's trivial, but it's useful in the modern era. IMAP folder support is very flakey, I reported some bugs but nothing got fixed.
It sounds like search needs a patch bounty, but it would be ridiculous to rewrite Thunderbird because search is naively implemented. I've never had problems with IMAP, nor do I use Exchange, so I can't speak to those...
Re: Proposal to start a new implementation of Thunderbird based on web technologies
#156Re: Proposal to start a new implementation of Thunderbird based on web technologies
#157I really like my hosted email because it's not on my computer. I love offline software, but it all sucks for security. Dropbox, Evernote, Outlook, etc. They all just dump my data in a folder anyone with physical access to my very stealable laptop can get at. Email is especially terrifying because there's just so much personal info in there. I have evernote and dropbox sitting in a bitlocker, so that's okay-ish, but t…
Re: Proposal to start a new implementation of Thunderbird based on web technologies
#158I skimmed through this and saw no management of PGP, encryption, key storage, or key exhange. Is that not going to be one of the main focuses of this? I wish that PGP/encrypted mail would be a main feature post Snowden.
Re: Proposal to start a new implementation of Thunderbird based on web technologies
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
> (snoozing, send later, reminders, open tracking, etc.) None of that has any appeal to me, I'd much rather a mail system which doesn't require using someone else's server. Maybe this isn't a priority for other people, but just putting it out there. This is what's making me not use Nylas today.
He's already given you a good alternative – fork and collaborate with other devs on a version that doesn't touch their server. Seems sufficient.
A good alternative in my opinion would be just to make some parts optional. Does not sound too hard, to implement (if the codebase is well done)
Re: Proposal to start a new implementation of Thunderbird based on web technologies
#160Does anyone actually have any problems with Thunderbird? I feel like it is "done" software. It works, perfectly, for all my needs. It's fast. It has great UI. It lets me read and write email.
Based on some chatter here recently, I just recently switched to trying out Claw, it hasn't been too long yet, so I don't know all of the issues yet, but at least it was easy to setup and is really really snappy and uses about 1/3 of the RAM.