Classic Microsoft. Their supposed FOSS turn is an obvious trap. Trust them at your own peril.
-Evidence?
-It's M$ bruh.
151–160 of 494 posts
Classic Microsoft. Their supposed FOSS turn is an obvious trap. Trust them at your own peril.
-Evidence?
-It's M$ bruh.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's certainly not the year of the Linux desktop, but it's not far off. I've successfully switched both parents to Linux and non tech at our company run completely on Linux. It's a real threat, especially with MS failing to innovate.
The year of linux is behind us. Today in 2016, Linux is the superior platform for both user-friendliness and stability. It is easier to use and install on a wider variety of hardware. The old belief that Windows is "easier" is deprecated, and it is time to change the conversation to reflect that truth.
Linux does not exceed windows at user friendliness.
Stability completely depends on your hardware, distro, and use case.
It has made great strides, and windows is regressing, but it's not done yet.
Do not attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. I see no conspiracy here, just an OEM that doesn't get it.
Maybe someone can help me understanding. Why is it OK to lock down smartphones, TV devices, consoles, but not OK for PCs?
win10antitrust.us is available on namecheap.com for $0.88.
disgusting company. it's the first time I'm ashamed of being a Chinese
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The year of linux is behind us. Today in 2016, Linux is the superior platform for both user-friendliness and stability. It is easier to use and install on a wider variety of hardware. The old belief that Windows is "easier" is deprecated, and it is time to change the conversation to reflect that truth.
From my experience supporting my colleagues, no. Linux does not exceed windows at user friendliness. Stability completely depends on your hardware, distro, and use case. It has made great strides, and windows is regressing, but it's not done yet.
Maybe someone can help me understanding. Why is it OK to lock down smartphones, TV devices, consoles, but not OK for PCs?
Just out of curiosity, what's the rationale for MS & Lenovo to do this, why to risk PR? The number of people wanting to install Linux is marginal and they are already "on the wrong side".