Google Moves Its Corporate Applications to the Internet
141–150 of 155 posts
Re: Google Moves Its Corporate Applications to the Internet
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
It isn't just corporations that are not fond of remote work. As a lay-employee, I am not fond of remote work either. I would much rather have all my teammates in the same room. Tribal? Yes, unapologetically so.
Why?
- lots of information is ambient at the team place - because not all people are that concentrated at home - because working alone is difficult sometimes (especially when you're under stress) - because you're harder to contact (yes, some people are afraid to call a colleague at home) - because people don't like to have 4 simultaneous chat sessions with colleagues
So a day of remote work certainly help, but I'd venture to say that's a maximum for many. Of course there are people who a re remote 100% of the time, but not everybody can do that. You have to love your work for that, and many people don' t /love/ their work...
Re: Google Moves Its Corporate Applications to the Internet
#143Re: Google Moves Its Corporate Applications to the Internet
#144lame.
Re: Google Moves Its Corporate Applications to the Internet
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
Dont be absurd. Humans conform to communities now more than ever.
Those communities are formed around ideas, not limited to geography as previously.
Re: Google Moves Its Corporate Applications to the Internet
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
What is a registered gun? I have plenty of guns, none of them are registered.
They all have serial numbers, and you had to show ID when buying them. So yes they are registered, you just might not be aware of this fact.
All firearms I have purchased privately, been gifted, or manufactured also do not fall under this category.
Re: Google Moves Its Corporate Applications to the Internet
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
This varies by country. In Australia if I want a gun I need to have a firearms license, I have to register every weapon I own and store them in an safe that meets certain minimum requirements (separate ammunition, requires key and combination to enter, minimum thickness, rules about how it is secured to the wall/floor, etc) and at any time the police can show up and ask me to show them I have the weapons correctly se…
You also need a valid reason to have a gun- you can be a member of a gun club and be a recreational shooter, or for animal control (my license) but to have that you have to have a property to shoot on
The Australian government would rather you get beaten, raped, or murdered in your home than enable to safely and effectively defend yourself.
Re: Google Moves Its Corporate Applications to the Internet
#148Earlier quoted context omitted.
You also need a valid reason to have a gun- you can be a member of a gun club and be a recreational shooter, or for animal control (my license) but to have that you have to have a property to shoot on
Self-defense is not a valid reason, that should be noted. The Australian government would rather you get beaten, raped, or murdered in your home than enable to safely and effectively defend yourself.
Re: Google Moves Its Corporate Applications to the Internet
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
People assert the counterexample, too, but in reality it's hard to find real cases where anything bad happened as a result of running an open wifi network.
There are many, though they all came out of people trying to get away from kiddie porn charges. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/24/unsecured-wifi-chil...
I'm not worried. It is extremely unlikely that there are any kiddie-porn fans in my neighborhood to begin with, much less any within range of my wifi signal.
Re: Google Moves Its Corporate Applications to the Internet
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
Self-defense is not a valid reason, that should be noted. The Australian government would rather you get beaten, raped, or murdered in your home than enable to safely and effectively defend yourself.
I know. There's not a single other implement in the home that could be used for defence. The government must want you beaten, raped and or murdered.
What implement would you use that would be safer (for yourself) than a firearm? What would be more effective?
Better yet, what would you do as a weaker individual when confronted with two or more aggressors?
I don't know about you, but I don't pretend to be tough enough to "take em!" Nor would I want my wife to try and fend off those who have already committed felonies against my property.
Baseball bats, batons, mace, knives, etc. are heinous, laughable, or otherwise ineffective tools for self-defense.
Simply put: the firearm is an effective equalizer. It enables a mother to defend her family against multiple aggressors at otherwise completely unfavorable odds.
I value the lives of myself and loved ones far more than someone who has violated the rights to my property. I refuse to cede any advantage that might make the difference in my survival.