Live data from Hacker News

YouTube now defaults to HTML5 video

youtube-eng.blogspot.com

141–150 of 414 posts

Re: YouTube now defaults to HTML5 video

#141
post #124
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh my god I completely forgot about RealPlayer. Luckily there was an alternative, Real Alternative, that enabled you to play the content without having to install that ghastly RealPlayer. It seems like the community always finds a way around crappy software.

What's the community using instead of iTunes?

Android?

Re: YouTube now defaults to HTML5 video

#142
post #124
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh my god I completely forgot about RealPlayer. Luckily there was an alternative, Real Alternative, that enabled you to play the content without having to install that ghastly RealPlayer. It seems like the community always finds a way around crappy software.

What's the community using instead of iTunes?

[deleted]

Re: YouTube now defaults to HTML5 video

#143
post #131
post #124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's the community using instead of iTunes?

What's crappy about iTunes?

I don't think iTunes is bloated, per se. I'm actually on an older version because they're removed useful features in 11 and 12 and there's no way to extend the program.

The bloat is probably integration with the store. That should be split into a separate program and iTunes should just be a music library manager. Of course, that won't happen since not many people care about having a persistent music library any more.

Re: YouTube now defaults to HTML5 video

#144
post #111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Out of interest, why is Firefox a 'proper' open-source browser while Chrome is not? Isn't Chrome pretty much just Chromium with a little bit of extra Google integration on top?

On Android Chrome isn't open source at all. On Windows/Linux several key parts are closed source, that's quite a bit more "than a bit of Google integration".

What key part is closed-source on Windows/Linux?

Re: YouTube now defaults to HTML5 video

#145

Click to play now doesn't work in Chrome, anyone have a workaround or a known-working extensions for click-to-play for html5 youtube?

If you're fine with downloading YouTube videos for playing locally, I've found 4K Video Downloader works well, at least under OS X. You'll wind up with plain H.264/AAC MPEG-4 files. https://www.4kdownload.com/download

How does that solve the problem of videos autoplaying when you access the page?

Re: YouTube now defaults to HTML5 video

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, Virginia, as hard as it may be to believe today, once upon a time RealNetworks was a very big deal. For a real spit-take, though, put one of the companies that we think of today as Very Big Deals next to it for comparison. Like, say, comparing Apple's performance to RealNetworks' over the decade from 1997 to 2007: https://www.google.com/finance?chdnp=0&chdd=0&chds=0&chdv=0&... (I omit the last few years because…

Comparing two companies over a period of time without taking into account splits, reverse splits, dividends, etc. isn't very meaningful.

Both Google and Yahoo Finance already adjust for splits. Yahoo has an 'adjusted close' value that reports the price adjusted for dividends, but these adjustments don't change the stock price so much that it would make comparing unadjusted values 'not meaningful'.

Re: YouTube now defaults to HTML5 video

#147
post #124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's the community using instead of iTunes?

foobar2000 and GoneMad Music Player? Dunno, I'm that propeller hat guy who carries his music around in Opus Format on his Android ...

What's Opus like for day-to-day use? Do you notice any battery hit on Android from it being decoded in software? (assuming AAC is done in hardware - could be wrong)

What kind of quality/filesize do you use? If I'm used to ~170kbit VBR AAC/MP3 for headphone use, what settings would I need for Opus?

Re: YouTube now defaults to HTML5 video

#148
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Netflix has HTML5 support for Safari and iirc IE.

The "HTML5" support requires proprietary binary blob that has no standard API (besides an API to launch it with opaque data from a proprietary server) and is licensed only to selected companies. Basically it's as much HTML5 as was HTML4. It's supported only by DRM vendors: Google (WideVine), Safari (FairPlay) and Microsoft (PlayReady) and doesn't work in open-source browsers (not even in Chromium or custom WebKit bui…

Mozilla is working hard on this, but I don't believe there is a published timeline for EME (using Adobe Access DRM) that supports Netflix yet. Getting closer, though: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=10158...

Re: YouTube now defaults to HTML5 video

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've had a pretty poor experience with HTML 5 video. It stutters far more than flash and in particular it does very weird things when I try to skip around in videos. I'll miss flash.

For me it's the other way around, in a 4 years old netbook I still use, the HTML5 video usually performs better than flash.

I don't think your experience has anything to do with my experience. That fact that on your hardware you felt html 5 video works better has no bearing on whether it work for me, on my hardware.

The fact that somebody down-voted me for adding a relevant anecdote, but happens to go against the tide of this threads opinion(ie: FU Flash), it's pretty indicative of the extremely poor voting etiquette around here.

Post reply on HN