Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, what's your threat model that you are worried about? I would imagine all of these companies have much better security and reliability than most internal IT departments. And I don't see them snooping for their own purposes. The NSA can get what they want anyways. The one big issue is subpoena's / third party doctrine issues, but I imagine for many companies that's a decent tradeoff for the reduced IT overhead /…
> And I don't see them snooping for their own purposes. Well, Google does read your email to show you better ads. But they never made a secret of that. > The NSA can get what they want anyways. If they really want to, yes. That doesn't mean one shouldn't try to make it as hard as possible for them. They won't bother if their cost/benefit analysis says you aren't worth it to get out the big guns. (Reliable 0 days aren…
Facebook Unveils Facebook at Work
141–145 of 145 posts
Re: Facebook Unveils Facebook at Work
#142"Users can then link their work and personal accounts together so that they are logged into both at the same time." Wow, that's really different from what I expected.
Re: Facebook Unveils Facebook at Work
#143"Lars Rasmussen, the engineering director at Facebook who is heading up the project, had in his past once headed up one of the failed efforts at an enterprise social network, Google Wave." Lars Rasmussen was also the guy behind google maps. Seems a little unfair to set it up like the above.
Was Wave even a social network? I vaguely remember it being more like a real-time Google Docs before Google Docs went realtime.
The problem with Wave was nobody knew what it was.
Re: Facebook Unveils Facebook at Work
#144Has anyone seen a work social network that wasn't a joke? We have one, and the only use is that your director/VP asks their org to follow them, and then posts various strategic stuff they want you to see. There's zero peer-to-peer usage at all.
Re: Facebook Unveils Facebook at Work
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think this is because of the inherent inequality that exists at work. In a typical social network, everyone is essentially "equal" when it comes to who you know and interact with. At work, you necessarily are very closely involved with people who hold significant authority over you. Because of this, you have to act incredibly more guarded at work and on its related networks.
That's definitely a big part of it. For a social network to have value, you need users who are compelled to frequently submit content. By adding a power structure, users have to evaluate their decisions, which can generate anxiety or extra work, leading to a drop off in contribution rate. It's one of the reasons teenagers ditched Facebook once their parents joined.