Live data from Hacker News

The Reddit Front Page Is Not a Meritocracy

toddwschneider.com

141–150 of 151 posts

Re: The Reddit Front Page Is Not a Meritocracy

#143

This post is interesting, but he should have just read the code: https://github.com/reddit/reddit/blob/master/r2/r2/lib/norma... This is an effect of the normalization algorithm, which biases towards trying to have a post from as may different subreddits as possible on the front page. Edit: At least we're consistent! Ketralnis said the same thing about an hour ago. :) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8568021

out of curiosity, what does the 'r2' stand for? does the two indicate that it's a rewrite of the original lisp code, as in r(eddit)2?

It's actually the second python version. :)

Re: The Reddit Front Page Is Not a Meritocracy

#144
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reddit has a default frontpage for people who don't have accounts. I lurked for years and was just fine without actually creating an account. :)

Isn't the default page mostly cat pictures and jokes? I tried viewing it logged out one time and I couldn't figure out who would like that?

reddit has been around since at least '07. I remember visiting the default front page back then and it was mostly developer-specific stuff.

A lot has changed.

Re: The Reddit Front Page Is Not a Meritocracy

#145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't the default page mostly cat pictures and jokes? I tried viewing it logged out one time and I couldn't figure out who would like that?

For many people, reddit is merely a source of internet junk food. They go there for cheap, quick hits of mindless amusement. See also: buzzfeed, 9gag, imgur, funnyjunk, etc.

I wish so hard I could filter out the junk posts. Just give me something to read, a good article, a debate.

Re: The Reddit Front Page Is Not a Meritocracy

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For many people, reddit is merely a source of internet junk food. They go there for cheap, quick hits of mindless amusement. See also: buzzfeed, 9gag, imgur, funnyjunk, etc.

I wish so hard I could filter out the junk posts. Just give me something to read, a good article, a debate.

Log in, unsubscribe from all the default front-page subreddits, and put together your own mix based on stuff you're interested in. The Reddit I read by doing this is a pretty genteel and sensible place.

Re: The Reddit Front Page Is Not a Meritocracy

#147
post #7

I left reddit years ago (and found HN) because although I agree with mostly liberal views it became too much of an echo-chamber for liberal views the frontpage is the extreme example of that. There are many great sub-reddits of course but it's not a place for politicial discussions (in fact I am still looking for a good place to have political discussions) Edit: Why does my personal experience get downvoted?

> I am still looking for a good place to have political discussions I sometimes wonder if such a place can exist. Outside of friendships, I kind of don't think it can.

You might want to look at http://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview

Re: The Reddit Front Page Is Not a Meritocracy

#148
post #131
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's likely that, at any given time, the top 2-3 links of /r/funny are highly-ranked enough to make the front page -- except the algorithm won't let more than one from that subreddit through at a time. So the alpha-funny link makes it, and the beta-funny link has to sit on page 3, suppressed, unable to take its rightful spot... until suddenly alpha-funny is too old, and is kicked off the front page, at which point be…

I see. That does make sense. Bit of a curious view on "normalization" but I can see how that would result in the strange graphs.

It appears the normalized_hot is only used for the first two pages. The rankings after that are subreddit-agnostic.

Re: The Reddit Front Page Is Not a Meritocracy

#149
post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's not how english works. That's not a double negative.

Now let's cancel out the double negative ("not", and "not") in what you said: > That's how english works. That's a double negative. Exactly!

Or...

> That's a double positive.

Indeed!

Post reply on HN