Live data from Hacker News

I’m Terrified of My New TV

brennancenter.org

141–150 of 346 posts

Re: I’m Terrified of My New TV

#141

So what happens if you just don't plug in the network cable or setup WiFi? How does it gather anything?

FBI van with free wifi goes through your neighborhood, the TV happily auto-connects to it and dumps all its data. How can we make the wifi module inside the TV unusable?

Open it, remove antenna?

Re: I’m Terrified of My New TV

#142
Perhaps I missed something in the article where the television has its own LTE (or other data connection) to call home without the owners knowledge.

My "smart tv" stays disconnected from the WIFI. Problem solved.

Re: I’m Terrified of My New TV

#143
OK, I get the surveillance and all that aspect. But how is it a good idea to have voice controls and gesture controls for a TV? First of all, I'm far from the TV. So I'd have to yell to it? Not enough that I'd feel stupid talking to my TV, I should make myself looking as completely gone bananas? And instruct everybody in my home, including the dog, to be quiet around the TV lest it misunderstands and takes something as an "erase all recorded shows" command? But as that is not enough humiliation, I should also try to capture it's attention by gesturing at it from my couch - and never again be able to scratch my knee or turn to the other side without TV switching a channel or making a permanent configuration to record everything Kardashian-related on every channel? How that is a useful feature, all surveillance aspects aside?

The article author complains if cameras and microphones in the TV are disabled, it would not function properly. I say, that's the only way it would function properly! I'm ok with my remote, thank you very much, and I don't want to converse with my TV or dance for it. I want it to entertain me, not the other way around.

Re: I’m Terrified of My New TV

#144
This is why 40% of people who buy a smart TV never connect it to the internet, and over 80% don't connect after trying it once for the novelty after unpacking.

(These numbers were stats collected internally by a minor TV manufacturer)

Re: I’m Terrified of My New TV

#145
post #131
post #106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Out of curiosity how many aspects of this TV could also be applied to your laptop. 1) It has a webcam 2) It has a microphone 3) You install software all the time that has access to both of these things. 3) Practically everything you do on it is tracked, cookied, and shared. (Sure some companies probably respect Do-Not-Track, but everyone?) 4) Do you realize that facebook knows your age, all of your friends, your demo…

yeah, but there are answers for a laptop to nearly every one of your bullets. I can't modify the hardware on a television reasonably, I can't change the operating system reasonably, nor can I modify the loaded software. I can't choose to run the server that it phones home to. I can remove my laptop's webcam, or order one without. Same for a mic (lenovo/dell/hp have 'government specials' -- laptops without mics/cams/a…

I guess I was thinking more broadly.

To most people everything feels like a walled garden, their phone, their computer, their TV. Sure you can install software on them, but very few people actually install new operating systems on anything at a low enough level that it would actually help their privacy.

As the technological elite, something like a TV that has so much embedded junk seems extra walled off. But I'd argue that most people have no clue how to stop websites from tracking them or to protect their privacy on any device. Most people have no IDEA what a cookie or an IP address is.

You happen to be familiar with software. To many people putting a piece of thick tape over the TV screen's camera, and microphone might be much easier than installing TOR. Dealing with the underlying embedded OS is probably super annoying, but hopefully you can still use your TV as a direct display using something similar to a Roku.

If a market for do-not-track devices exists someone will fill it, but I worry that the general population will have no idea that it's necessary or even care.

Re: I’m Terrified of My New TV

#147
NBC News reported this in 2012.

http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/your-tv-watching-you-l...

Nothing happened.

Vizio has a much less intrusive system. Some of their TVs have "Vizio apps", which can trigger popups on the screen based on the content being played. This can be completely turned off. They don't have microphones or cameras, just remotes. Still, the TV does phone home to Vizio HQ.

Re: I’m Terrified of My New TV

#148
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He did. Privacy is merely a byproduct of having the freedom to control your computer. We should all feel deeply offended at not having that control, if we know what's good for us. Looking at the current state of affairs, I'm starting to think RMS wasn't radical and fanatical enough!

And you probably feel that way because you're deeply intimate with the inner-workings of computers and so having "control" means something to you. That's not true for most of the population. Let's replace "cars" with "computers" in the freedom slogan. I know nothing about cars, and to be honest, I don't really care to. Cars help me get from A to B, and I would gladly trade freedom to tinker with the inner workings of…

The difference between cars and computers is that people are still relatively still in control of their cars (and they should be if they're driving them...), and there isn't all that much variability in what cars can do - "get from A to B" - nor is there currently much that the manufacturers can do to interfere with that ability to "get from A to B".

On the other hand, computers are how we communicate with and consume information from others; they are essentially how we view the world. Thus what power the companies-in-control have to limit, persuade, and otherwise manipulate the population who uses computers is far greater than what they can do with cars.

To come back to the car analogy, if the manufacturers had the same type of power those making computers and their software did, they would be able to remotely control your car to make it go not where you want it to, disable it if you tried to drive to "non-approved/licensed" locations or if you attempted to drive faster than they allowed, carried more passengers than licensed for, etc.

Of course, convenience and control are not disjoint either - and more control can also lead to greater convenience, as users customise the software they use to make their use of it more convenient.

Re: I’m Terrified of My New TV

#149
post #47

We need a Butlerian Jihad against surveillance. You know what will never stop this? Posts on hacker news. Letters to your congressman (LG can donate a fuqton more to his re-election campaign than you can). Voting with your dollar (people who know what a privacy policy is are few and far between). You know what will? Taking these TVs into the street, smashing and burning them. Mobs storming Best Buy and smashing the s…

> You know what will never stop this? [...] Voting with your dollar (people who know what a privacy policy is are few and far between).

I disagree. I think voting with your dollar works pretty well actually. Case-in-point: The recent uproar over the Xbox One's Kinect. The original plan called for the Kinect to be a required component and for the microphone to always be on. Thanks to consumer backlash, Microsoft backpedaled on the always-on requirement pretty quickly, and they've started selling Kinect-less Xbox Ones as well.

Part of this is because Sony did an excellent job of capitalizing on these mis-steps with the PS4. Because there's no reason a competitor can't do the same against these smart TVs. You don't need customers to read the privacy policy; you just need to tell them that "the TV is telling Uncle Sam when you have sex."

Re: I’m Terrified of My New TV

#150
post #47

We need a Butlerian Jihad against surveillance. You know what will never stop this? Posts on hacker news. Letters to your congressman (LG can donate a fuqton more to his re-election campaign than you can). Voting with your dollar (people who know what a privacy policy is are few and far between). You know what will? Taking these TVs into the street, smashing and burning them. Mobs storming Best Buy and smashing the s…

Come on, this is bullshit. I cannot say about your congressmen but any enterprise will care if their goods will not get bought. And there comes the first step: You must educate people about their needs of privacy. Just smashing things to peaces does not help at all, it's maybe attracting hateful activists but not giving understanding.
Post reply on HN