Earlier quoted context omitted.
That'd dodging the question and you know it. Maybe the ring is a family heirloom passed down for generations. Still not sophisticated? What about the person who's father left them his vintage 1913 archtop guitar, and they don't really play it that often but have fond memories of listening to their dad noodle around and play blues music in the evening? Is it more reasonable to say that nobody should attach emotional v…
I wonder if you realize that just because your family bought some trinket (or whatever) for money some time in the past, it doesn't make it special. "Look, honey, my grandgrandfather wasted his money on this piece of junk. He was very susceptible to salesman pitches. He was also a lottery ticket buyer. A drunk. And he beat his wife. Boy, I'm glad I turned out better." Now, if my grandgrandfather crafted a piece of je…
a) A hypothetical story about a hypothetical great-grandfather apparently invalidates the value of family heirlooms
b) crafted items are valuable because of the information they hold, which inform us how people thought and what their approach to something was. Their purchasing patterns, however, tell us absolutely nothing about how they thought, what their approach was, or what types of things they valued.
c) Having family heirlooms which were foolishly bought back in the day is primitive thinking (and a sign of being poor). If your will isn't one hundred percent cash you are wasting everybody's time.
d) Sentimental value is bullshit, and market value is a straw man; heirlooms apparently have literally no value at all.
e) You have to make your "name" on your own, but if your name is hard for people to pronounce then you should just deal with it when they give you a different one.
Thanks for clearing all that up.