New DuckDuckGo design
141–150 of 225 posts
Re: New DuckDuckGo design
#142I've tried DuckDuckGo a couple times before. Today I decided to give it one day and see if I felt more comfortable with it. I was having a really hard time parsing the results so I did a search side by side in Google and DuckDuckGo. I looked at Google and thought "yeah, I know I want link #3" then I looked over to DuckDuckGo and saw that the same link was result #2 but I couldn't identify it as the page I wanted just…
I tried that myself several times, and never quite managed to do it. It only stuck when I forced myself to do it for an extended period, at which point I finally started being able to reliably differentiate between "good results" and "results that feel like Google". I found it disturbing to realize how much I had conflated those.
Re: New DuckDuckGo design
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks! We'd also encourage every developer to check out: http://duckduckhack.com/ The example reported doesn't seem to be an issue the organic links but if you find any at all, please let us know. Also, we're on the lookout for any instant answers that pop by default but are irrelevant for the query. If you see any, please let us know at https://duck.co/forum
How about you incorporate "flag as irrelevant" button next to each result? Or some way of users reporting back to you the order they would expect from your SE? I am not sure how you could combat misuse, but I'm sure there coule be some measures taken.
Re: New DuckDuckGo design
#144The UI is super slick. Bravo!! I miss some of the simplicity of the old DDG but after adjusting the only thing i find missing is the StackOverflow integration. It may totally be there, i just haven't had the right query yet...
Re: New DuckDuckGo design
#145I'm loving it – excellent work!
Re: New DuckDuckGo design
#146Luckily, there is a "classic" mode. Please Gabriel, make classic mode the default mode again.
Re: New DuckDuckGo design
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm sorry but this is pure spam in this context. I think it would be far more prudent to submit this as its own post.
Come on, DDG is not storing datas, neither do we. This was a good feedback and we're looking for more? Beside you know how hard it is to get just a fraction of attention from the community unless you game the stats... Thanks for downvote :-S
Re: New DuckDuckGo design
#148Earlier quoted context omitted.
You've just made me very happy.
For fellow vimmers, using j & k also works ;-)
Re: New DuckDuckGo design
#149Not sure if anyone at DDG would ever read this, but my comments on the preview are still valid. The contrast is way too low, it prefers vertical over horizontal (I, like any people, have a widescreen monitor. Displaying 3 search results by default is a little absurd), a couple other issues. It feels like a mobile interface. Oh, and there's no way to revert to the old version. The options merely change the color schem…
I don't get this contrast thing everyone is saying. My eyes are shit, and the "light grey on white" pops out fine. Any darker and it would be annoying. I really like the current color scheme. My 'puter is a mac with retina screen - so maybe it's a monitor thing? Are there any "progressive desaturation" or "color calibration detection" tricks available to web devs in these situations?
Re: New DuckDuckGo design
#150Looks good, but they really need to weed out some spammy websites from their index. For example, all the . stats.com sites that try to get traffic when people search for various brands, or this strange one: -login" rel="nofollow">http://www.loginto.org/ -login (apparently it tries to steal login credentials, or I don't see the point).