Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think he was, in no small part, popular for the same reason that Sean Penn got his second Oscar for Milk : politics. Marquez thumbed the eye of colonialism. And he wrote a bunch of rolling sentences with colourful imagery. But I don't see why he deserves the Nobel Prize over, to take a glaring example, Borges. Except that Borges didn't really write anything politically fashionable, as opposed to possessing any othe…
This is utter nonsense. García Márquez wrote some of the most compelling and beautiful stories of the 20th century. Borges wrote the literary equivalent of late night stoner conversations, covering up a lack of substance with erudition. I don't deny that the Nobel Prize can be political, but García Márquez was one of the most deserving recipients.
Gabriel García Márquez, Literary Pioneer, Dies at 87
141–150 of 165 posts
Re: Gabriel García Márquez, Literary Pioneer, Dies at 87
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
This whole debate is why the translator chose "discover". It's a bit awkward because it can be interpreted two ways, but in one of the ways it carries the connotation of seeing for the first time, without the lengthy phrase "to get to know" or "to see for the first time" disrupting the rhythm of the prose. The crux of the problem, of course, is that the word "meet" in English only applies to people.
"The crux of the problem, of course, is that the word "meet" in English only applies to people." Says who? The last time I met with danger, I won! ;-)
Re: Gabriel García Márquez, Literary Pioneer, Dies at 87
#143“Many years later, in front of the firing squad, colonel Aureliano Buendía would remember that distant afternoon his father took him to see ice." Best opening line of a book ever. RIP.
I've been collecting great opening lines to books. This line has topped the list -- not that I ranked them, but I put it first, followed by "It was inevitable. The scent of bitter almonds always reminded Dr. Juvenal Urbino of the fate of unrequited love." from Love in the Time of Cholera. If you know of others that are missing, let me know: http://joshuaspodek.com/great-opening-lines-to-books On a note of remembrance…
Re: Gabriel García Márquez, Literary Pioneer, Dies at 87
#144"Less plausibly"! "Less plausibly"!
Geeze. Someone needs to teach these goobs to write.
Re: Gabriel García Márquez, Literary Pioneer, Dies at 87
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Rest in peace. I, on the other hand, hope that the three men that Marquez's close friend Castro had executed for trying to get to the US on a boat will rest in peace. Not to mention all the dissidents who died in his prisons. Marquez lived in Cuba and for decades witnessed the daily suffering and poverty of the Cuban people. The endless monitoring of Castro's secret police. The constant rationing of basic necessiti…
I have no love for Castro (maybe some contempt), but I think Marquez here is approximately as culpable as Shostakovich, which is to say not. He was a writer, not a reporter, and if we try to pull an artist down to the level of politics it's a lose-lose if we're successful.
On the other hand, I believe Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn would like to have a word with you. Out back, in the alley.
Re: Gabriel García Márquez, Literary Pioneer, Dies at 87
#146Oh my. A paragon of magical realism and my second favorite author. Rest in peace. Liking storytelling alone is sometimes not enough to like Marquez, you have to love language too. He uses (some might say abuses) language to impact his storytelling, often using incredibly long, convoluted sentences to weave his narrative. It can be hard to follow, sometimes intentionally, but I find it enormously satisfying to read an…
Which was the short story with the sadistic dentist torturing the mayor?
Re: Gabriel García Márquez, Literary Pioneer, Dies at 87
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
I cannot do a literary critique. But I can tell you that when I was 17, I started reading "One hundred years of solicitude" and couldn't stop until I finished the whole book. I felt enchanted, it is a feeling that I never had either before or after. I read it in Spanish, (my native tongue) so your mileage may vary.
I think sometimes it is OK to be simply enchanted. (Well I think it's always OK, but ...) I tend to favor literary "analysis" that dwells on that feeling of enchantment, tries to explain it to an extent, and sometimes even re-create that feeling. I'm not sure an overarching "meaning" is always really needed. For several years I followed the mailing lists dedicated to several of my favorite authors, and at the same ti…
Re: Gabriel García Márquez, Literary Pioneer, Dies at 87
#148Re: Gabriel García Márquez, Literary Pioneer, Dies at 87
#149“Many years later, in front of the firing squad, colonel Aureliano Buendía would remember that distant afternoon his father took him to see ice." Best opening line of a book ever. RIP.
"Muchos años después, frente al pelotón de fusilamiento, el coronel Aureliano Buendía había de recordar aquella tarde remota en que su padre lo llevó a conocer el hielo."
Re: Gabriel García Márquez, Literary Pioneer, Dies at 87
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, that must be why entire philosophy courses are based on Borges. Stoner lit.
I was considering phrasing my comment as "conversations between stoned philosophy students", so yes, that sounds about right. Not to mention the fact that a philosophy course about Borges will likely be examining the work of the philosophers Borges was referencing. I've yet to see anyone make the claim that Borges originated any of the important philosophical ideas in his stories. Edit: Just to back this up a little…
The idea of text as a finite construct struck me as original when I first encountered it in The Library of Babel. Are there any earlier sources that I should be aware of?
As someone who's interested in interactive fiction, I found a lot of prescient thinking in Borges. His work becomes more relevant over time, even as it posits its own eventual redundancy. I'm not sure anyone can say that about García Márquez. But like others are saying, there is no need to take away respect from one of these authors to pay it to the other.
Edit: Just to back this up a little more, here is a quote from the man himself: "But I wonder if they are my ideas. Because really I am not a thinker. I have used the philosophers’ ideas for my own private literary purposes, but I don’t think that I’m a thinker. I suppose that my thinking has been done for me by Berkeley, by Hume, by Schopenhauer, by Mauthner perhaps."
In other news, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impostor_syndrome is a thing.