Live data from Hacker News

Why I’ll be Pirating Adobe’s Products From Now On

parkerrr.com

141–150 of 176 posts

Re: Why I’ll be Pirating Adobe’s Products From Now On

#141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If there are two products, and both can accomplish the necessary task(s), and one is cheaper, the cheaper product is the superior product.

I think the comparison was between paying and not paying for Photoshop, not between Photoshop and Pixelmator.

I pay for Pixelmator with great joy. Awesome product, intuitive interface, frequent updates.

Re: Why I’ll be Pirating Adobe’s Products From Now On

#142
post #29

I have an issue with the car analogy. First, warranty isn't forever. Second CS5 was released four years ago, which is a really long time in software, to make the analogy more accurate you'd need to take a really old car that doesn't have replacement parts being made for it anymore to the dealer and claim they need to fix it. There's also the issue of Student/Teacher edition means you can't use it except for education…

Bullshit.

Absolute bullshit. When you're paying HUNDREDS of dollars for software, damn right I expect better support 4 years down the track. Hell, it's barely even support. Let me download it, like you used to only two years back. Are you kidding me?

Re: Why I’ll be Pirating Adobe’s Products From Now On

#143
post #30
post #5

Hate to say it, but I pirate Adobe's software for real. I use Pixelmator and Sketch, which are superior products at one tenth of the price. However, I often need to open files in Adobe's legacy formats, and since they do not provide any sort of converter software, I must take the only option available to me.

Can you clarify how pirating Adobe's software is "the only option available to [you]"? I get that it's ridiculously expensive and generally a pain in the ass... but needing to do something expensive doesn't provide justification for bypassing the cost, or in any way make "paying for the product" no longer an option.

I don't want to pay hundreds of dollars just to open a file or convert it to SVG for Sketch. If they were going to be moral about it (IMO), Adobe would offer a free converter.

"B.. b.. but", you might say, "you can't just force Adobe to write a free converter!"

Well, you can't force me to pay for their paid software. And I'm someone who has spent thousands of dollars on graphics software of various kinds over the years.

Re: Why I’ll be Pirating Adobe’s Products From Now On

#144
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you mean, "the cheaper of the two options available to me."

IMO Sketch is actually more relevant than Photoshop for some work,

Sketch is flat out better for almost everything. (In a web and interface workflow)

Re: Why I’ll be Pirating Adobe’s Products From Now On

#146

Adobe does practically nothing to deter piracy except put the token lock on the shed. Their copy protection has always been trivial to break. They seem to have worked out that it's better for someone to pirate their tools than it is for them to use a competing, cheaper product. Their bottom line would probably take a huge hit if they were to ever make it less than trivial to pirate. Not sure if this strategy is start…

Actually, CS5 and CS6 both had updates that broke the cracked versions, now when "hackers" release the cracked version they recommend disabling auto-update.

Re: Why I’ll be Pirating Adobe’s Products From Now On

#147
Obviously, if you use proprietary software, you do not control it, it controls you. The FSF message rings true as usual (not as always, I don't think the world is black and white).

Many people have these stories. How you got screwed over by some proprietary company in some way. The only solution is for the company to guarantee their trustworthiness by respecting software freedom i.e. being FLOSS.

Re: Why I’ll be Pirating Adobe’s Products From Now On

#148
post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> "Edit: how many times have I bought a movie on iTunes to show my kids how to do it right, and then torrented it as I couldn't wait for the download, too slow." Strange, I find iTunes the fastest way to download media + you can watch while downloading. For me that usually means spend 30-60 seconds downloading and then start watching and the download keeps up.

Not here (Australia). iTunes can take anywhere up to 40 minutes to download enough of a high res movie to start watching. And can then randomly stop the movie as it fails to keep up enough bandwidth over the 1:30 or so run duration. Torrents are normally half an hour from start to finish.

Are you using Google DNS? I've had issues with CDNs because of that.

Re: Why I’ll be Pirating Adobe’s Products From Now On

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Scott" Venkatasubramanian

I actually see native speakers make the "should of" mistake far more often than I see non-native speakers make it, probably because it's a mistake based on pronunciation. Native speakers often incorrectly spell based on pronunciation, while non-native speakers often incorrectly pronounce based on spelling. In fact, the (presumably native-speaking) author of the linked blog post makes such a mistake - he uses the word…

In parts of England "should of" is in common use amongst younger speakers to the extent that "should of" to me is associated with South or East London more than non-native speakers (though it's in use many other places in England too).

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialect_levelling_in_Britain#Ex...

My four year old might occasionally use it because his friends does, and he knows it drives his mother absolutely crazy when she notices he uses South London dialect features.

Post reply on HN