Live data from Hacker News

Sacrificing everything for my dog. How I became a programmer

medium.com

141–150 of 150 posts

Re: Sacrificing everything for my dog. How I became a programmer

#141
post #90

I like the story, but I feel it's important to mention that the authors stated opinion on Karma is terrifying . Karma is essentially the worst sort of belief, in that superficially it seems to reward good behavior and punish bad behavior. This appeals to a lot of people because of its clear "carrot/stick" mentality and overall simplicity. This is the "Just-World" hypothesis. In reality, this kind of thinking means th…

This is a very superficial interpretation of the idea of karma. What you're describing is just someone rationalizing being a judgmental asshole. Karma is about "paying it forward", not in an attempt to gain the favor of the universe, but because it is the morally correct thing to do. If you believe in karma, you believe that the machinations of the universe will reward and punish justly, but you don't participate in…

While I don't think that the author of the piece meant it this way:

If I believe in Karma, arguably I believe that the best thing I can do is to fulfil my station in life as I aspire to break the cycle of rebirth. It's definitely worth remembering that Karma existed in a society that did have, and still does in some ways, a very strong caste system where the good of the society was often seen as a consequence of everyone doing their assigned role. Notably, in the Bhagavad Gita, one of the arguments that Krishna uses to convince Arjuna that he should fight against his own family is because it will fulfil his verdic duties - in this instance his station in life as a warrior.

Re: Sacrificing everything for my dog. How I became a programmer

#142
post #10

Remember kids, if you work hard, sacrifice, and have parents with a spare house in Tahoe they can lend you rent-free indefinitely, you too can make it as a programmer.

I can't understand the general hostility toward getting (financial) help from your parents or living with them until you are financially independent, even after 18/25/30. I know I am biased as an italian (and pretty much adhere to the true stereotype) but I can't find anything wrong from getting help from the people that brought you in this world and which probably love you more than anyone else on the planet (and th…

OK, I tend to make resentful comments about kids with trust funds or who still live at home, but honestly, they would be fools to not tap into the resources available to them.

Re: Sacrificing everything for my dog. How I became a programmer

#143

I like the story, but I feel it's important to mention that the authors stated opinion on Karma is terrifying . Karma is essentially the worst sort of belief, in that superficially it seems to reward good behavior and punish bad behavior. This appeals to a lot of people because of its clear "carrot/stick" mentality and overall simplicity. This is the "Just-World" hypothesis. In reality, this kind of thinking means th…

This belief is sometimes called the Just World Hypothesis: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just-world_hypothesis

Re: Sacrificing everything for my dog. How I became a programmer

#144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Regarding the litter box situation, I prefer dogs. They let you know when they have to go so you don't have to scoop foul-smelling poop and stink up the apartment.

I have two cats, and they don't stink up the house. Use good litter, not that clay crap, but the wheat or corn based ones, and scoop every day into something like a litter genie. It works perfectly, except when my older cat forgets to bury. The younger one usually takes care of that though.

I don't know, our two kittens (now grown) make the stinkiest poop imaginable. We scoop them up right after they do it, but they still manage to stink the whole apartment up. I don't know why that happens, they only eat pate/dry food, but it does.

Re: Sacrificing everything for my dog. How I became a programmer

#145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you give a billionaire a tax break he is likely to invest in things that make people like myself happy. Examples include SpaceX, Netflix, Facebook or whatever. If the government instead keeps taxes high, the money will simply pay people not to work. We are all poorer as a result.

>If you give a billionaire a tax break he is likely to invest in things that make people like myself happy. People often make this claim and similar claims - ie tax cuts for the rich create jobs and growth. These are empirical claims; you need evidence for them. I don't know about you, but I can't imagine being a billionaire and not deciding to invest in cool stuff because my tax rate went up 5 or 10 percentage point…

I made no claims about creating jobs or growth. I rarely make such arguments, since a) I think a focus on creating jobs is nonsensical and b) empirical evidence showing stuff causes growth is virtually nonexistent.

My claim is much milder. As a billionaire, basically everything you have is invested. If he has $100m less, then $100m less is invested.

Investment has a chance of benefiting me. Consumption by the leisure class (i.e., beneficiaries of government redistribution) does not. FlyinRyan is simply incorrect in his claims.

Re: Sacrificing everything for my dog. How I became a programmer

#146
post #58
post #28

A dog is a living creature, just like a child is. Sounds good enough to attempt to make it happy. I wouldn't worry about what others think. ;-) (note: I don't have a dog.)

> A dog is a living creature, just like a child is. Ok, mosquitoes are too. I'm really worried for those people equating their prefered pets with human beings. I remember those technokids playing the beggars in front of a somethingmarket in France, they had four enormous dogs and wanted money supposedly for their pets' food. Bullshit. If you like dogs, you do not chain them allday long to some grocery entrance, and t…

That's quite a stretch you made there.

Re: Sacrificing everything for my dog. How I became a programmer

#147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>If you give a billionaire a tax break he is likely to invest in things that make people like myself happy. People often make this claim and similar claims - ie tax cuts for the rich create jobs and growth. These are empirical claims; you need evidence for them. I don't know about you, but I can't imagine being a billionaire and not deciding to invest in cool stuff because my tax rate went up 5 or 10 percentage point…

I made no claims about creating jobs or growth. I rarely make such arguments, since a) I think a focus on creating jobs is nonsensical and b) empirical evidence showing stuff causes growth is virtually nonexistent. My claim is much milder. As a billionaire, basically everything you have is invested. If he has $100m less, then $100m less is invested. Investment has a chance of benefiting me. Consumption by the leisure…

What a bunch of nonsense. A billionaire investing millions has virtually no chance of helping you. The only conceivable way he can help you is by participating in an IPO so that particular company gets an injection of cash to use to hire more people, etc. But virtually all trading that will go on with his/her millions/billions is buying and selling of stock that IPO'ed long ago and no longer bring the issuer any money at all.

The kind of investment the billionaire is doing is zero-sum in nature and doesn't help anyone but them.

It's hilarious that you imagine some billionaire playing the stock market has more value to you than people spending money on products (that you could be making). The 80's called and asked for their misconceptions back.

Re: Sacrificing everything for my dog. How I became a programmer

#148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I made no claims about creating jobs or growth. I rarely make such arguments, since a) I think a focus on creating jobs is nonsensical and b) empirical evidence showing stuff causes growth is virtually nonexistent. My claim is much milder. As a billionaire, basically everything you have is invested. If he has $100m less, then $100m less is invested. Investment has a chance of benefiting me. Consumption by the leisure…

What a bunch of nonsense. A billionaire investing millions has virtually no chance of helping you. The only conceivable way he can help you is by participating in an IPO so that particular company gets an injection of cash to use to hire more people, etc. But virtually all trading that will go on with his/her millions/billions is buying and selling of stock that IPO'ed long ago and no longer bring the issuer any mone…

I'm confused - people consuming helps me because maybe I can work hard to enable their consumption? Huh? Explain how this helps me again?

Re: Sacrificing everything for my dog. How I became a programmer

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What a bunch of nonsense. A billionaire investing millions has virtually no chance of helping you. The only conceivable way he can help you is by participating in an IPO so that particular company gets an injection of cash to use to hire more people, etc. But virtually all trading that will go on with his/her millions/billions is buying and selling of stock that IPO'ed long ago and no longer bring the issuer any mone…

I'm confused - people consuming helps me because maybe I can work hard to enable their consumption? Huh? Explain how this helps me again?

You're being thick. People consuming creates a market. You have the opportunity to capture a part of that market to make money. This is the entire point of capitalism. You somehow imagine that fucking billionaires investing in funds is more beneficial to you than the actual markets? Take a step back and think about what you're saying.

Re: Sacrificing everything for my dog. How I became a programmer

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm confused - people consuming helps me because maybe I can work hard to enable their consumption? Huh? Explain how this helps me again?

You're being thick. People consuming creates a market . You have the opportunity to capture a part of that market to make money. This is the entire point of capitalism. You somehow imagine that fucking billionaires investing in funds is more beneficial to you than the actual markets? Take a step back and think about what you're saying.

People producing is also a part of creating a market.
Post reply on HN