Live data from Hacker News

News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

m.guardiannews.com

141–150 of 245 posts

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#141
This all comes down to a distinction that is not made in the article at all. One has a choice in engaging the news: one can be a passive consumer of whatever gets thrown at one, or one can be a thoughtful consumer who directs one's own reading/viewing of the news. None of the issues mentioned by the author apply to the latter approach.

In a highly interconnected, multicultural, technological world, it is more important than ever for the ordinary citizen (let alone the entrepreneur, thinker, or "creative type") to be aware of what is going on in the world, and on every scale (global to local). The author's recommendation would lead to a radical disengagement that would be suitable only for those aspiring to be hermits or stylites.

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#143
post #35

This article irks me. Although most "news" has regressed into banal link bait just plain yellow journalism, and the notion of the "news organization" has undergone an inexorable transition towards the likes of Buzzfeed the the Huffington Post, it's absurd to assert that all news is worthless. First, his point that no news can be of value to one's personal situation or decision-making is false. News has impacted my li…

I looked into this and experimented with it a while back. My conclusion was that: a. If something is actually important to me, I will find out about it whether I read the news or not. b. Keeping in mind (a), any news that I don't hear about through other channels is not urgent. c. A quick "news" piece will have almost no depth or context that could actually give the story relevance. And will very often just be outrig…

How do you test a) ? How do you know what you don't know? :) It seems like you're saying that something is not important if you do not find out about it..

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#144
James Althucher is a writer who has lived through a bunch of nasty experiences, and now writes about what he's learnt.

In his writing he often preaches to cut yourself off from news.

Here's an article I found quickly that makes reference to avoiding stress sources like news: http://www.jamesaltucher.com/2011/09/how-to-cure-stress-befo...

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#145

The article takes a primordial approach to what news is. Technology and media have long addressed this problem, and news is really free now - thanks to Blogger, Google News, Twitter and the like. Its also an irony that most of us discover our news on a site like Hacker News, and are seconding an opinion that news has become bad. Some ways to rethink news: 1) News should be an ambient thing. It should be around you, a…

One of the main reasons I come to Hacker News is because a) the upvoted articles tend to be of high quality and in-depth, and b) the comments section tends to have even greater depth of discussion and variation of opinion.

I think both those points make HN fall outside the article's criticism, for the most part.

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#146

I've come to a similar conclusion. Because news emphasizes the dramatic over the contextual, they're always providing me poor information in an even poorer context. That's just the way the business works. I've done something weird, though: I switched to plaintext commentary. So each day I scan my personal news site, http://newspaper23.com . It only does commentary. I find that by scanning the titles I can see what ne…

Your argument rests on the flawed premise that the reader is a passive fool waiting to be spoon-fed their morning panic ration. An article may be the top story of the day, but that doesn't mean it is important or relevant to me. Clearly there is a "news cycle" and every day there must be some top story. The reader is not compelled to pay heed. The discriminating reader does not perceive a newspaper to be some distill…

I think you covered 99% of America here:

"Your argument rests on the flawed premise that the reader is a passive fool waiting to be spoon-fed their morning panic ration."

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#147
post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not certain if the analogy that news is bad for you is true. I've heard this multiple times from multiple people and practiced going on a news diet (temporarily) even though I'm used to being on top of what's happening. What I ended up realizing was that the news wasn't really affecting me, because, what I was reading was not the crap about celebs, gossip and other nonsense, but actual stuff around me that was ha…

I've found that if anything is truly important, I'll hear about through non-news channels (friends, family, cow-orkers, personal blogs, etc.). It works remarkably well.

And Hacker News. If anything really significant is happening on this planet, it will end up here. HN replaced news in 100% for me.

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#148
There's one thing apparently missing in the article (and discussion here) that for me is the most important reason not to read news - namely, they lie. All the time. And when they don't, they systematically confuse stuff, ending up in writing wrong articles anyway.

Proof? Just pretty much every article about science, technology or business submitted here on HN gets debunked in the top comment. If they can't get simple facts right in the matters of basic science or business, I seriously doubt (by induction) that anything else they write is anywhere near the truth.

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#149
I haven't been reading or watching the news for years, now, and it's had a huge positive effect on my life.

But it's also made me, I think, somewhat more sensitive and aware of how other similar things affect me. Which is why I've started to cut down on Twitter, and Hacker News.

Re: News is bad for you – and giving up reading it will make you happier

#150
post #137

I don't read news anymore. I haven't, for years. After reading a newspaper I didn't remember anything of what I had read. I was as well off after reading the paper as before reading it. The same with internet news sites, there's just... news, everywhere. It doesn't seem to stick, and it doesn't change my life. If something truly important happens, the information will eventually trickle down to myself via friends and…

And yet you are posting on Hacker "News".
Post reply on HN