Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, yes. That's what is happening. The contest is called "market" and "the people" reward competitors by paying them. Patents are used to enforce the rules so that competitors don't cheat. Selective breeding requires sometimes _decades_ of commitment and a lot of very boring work. This is not a good fit for academia and even worse fit for government programs.
> _decades_ of commitment and a lot of very boring work Sounds like it's ripe for AI automation. Need less of this nonsense about restricting access because "effort should be rewarded with exclusivity".
Farmer, marketer at odds over sales of white nectarines
141–144 of 144 posts
Re: Farmer, marketer at odds over sales of white nectarines
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
> _decades_ of commitment and a lot of very boring work Sounds like it's ripe for AI automation. Need less of this nonsense about restricting access because "effort should be rewarded with exclusivity".
How do you propose to use AI to grow fruit trees faster?
[0] https://twitter.com/DouglasYaoDY/status/2070904914050797582 / https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48706690
Re: Farmer, marketer at odds over sales of white nectarines
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
If someone grows a new tree from seeds after buying your fruit, their trees will take several years to bear fruit right? Works almost like a patent anyway. (I don't know fruit growing well so maybe that's not true)
You could graft a young tree to a mature one to decrease the time to market.
Re: Farmer, marketer at odds over sales of white nectarines
#144Earlier quoted context omitted.
You could graft a young tree to a mature one to decrease the time to market.
Again, not an expert, but I believe you need to graft a cutting from a tree that already bears fruit onto rootstock. Only the inventor of the new seed variety would have a fruiting tree.