Live data from Hacker News

Opening up 'Zero-Knowledge Proof' technology to promote privacy in age assurance

blog.google

141–150 of 302 posts

Re: Opening up 'Zero-Knowledge Proof' technology to promote privacy in age assurance

#141

If you need personalized government attestation to visit a site, then the government has the ability to dynamically deny and rescind your individual access to any site that adopts age verification, at any time. Once adult sites adopt the system, it will creep over to any site wanting to limit their liability. Banks. Business services. Eventually almost everyone. Liability the government will dramatize and escalate. Y…

If you're ok with slippery slopes, are you ok with ad hominems?

Re: Opening up 'Zero-Knowledge Proof' technology to promote privacy in age assurance

#142
post #64
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is basically the double spending problem which has been solved in various ways.

For example, Chaum's blind signatures https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_signature let you create a credential that can be anonymously used once but it gets de-anonymized and invalidated if used a second time. This could be applied to age verification so that each credential could only be used once.

I should really look into blinding strategies some time - there are some very interesting possibilities in there.

Re: Opening up 'Zero-Knowledge Proof' technology to promote privacy in age assurance

#145

Age is just one metric. I don't want zero proof tech about information X. I don't want to have an identity. Full stop.

This can be used to have zero-proof knowledge of "over 18" or "not over 18". So they don't really get your age, except that you are in two broad ranges.

the visited site won't have the info. but someone in the chain will definitely know your identity. the government, private contractors.

Re: Opening up 'Zero-Knowledge Proof' technology to promote privacy in age assurance

#146
post #87
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not that I want my kids looking at porn or violent content, but I’m far more concerned about man-o-sphere influencers than that other stuff.

Manosphere content is toxic and harmful but the hyperviolence and desensitisation of the former should not be downplayed. That's where the mass shooters evidently come from.

>That's where the mass shooters evidently come from.

Citation needed?

Re: Opening up 'Zero-Knowledge Proof' technology to promote privacy in age assurance

#147
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We need to stop this helicopter civilization bullshit. We're building 1984 to protect from god knows what imaginary harms. Stop putting plastic wrap around people's freedoms, liberty, and right to privacy.

The harms of smartphones and social media are about as far from imaginary as it could get. The data is screaming at us. We will look back at handing kids phones with instagram like giving kids cigarettes and think wtf were we doing.

Why are we only focused on kids? the boomers are doing more harm to the society and democracy by spreading mis-information via social media. If we want to have an honest conversation let's talk about every age group and limit it to everyone rather than using kids as a scapegoat

Re: Opening up 'Zero-Knowledge Proof' technology to promote privacy in age assurance

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, but it's never been more important than now. Also, I did not have enough chars for an HN title.

Funny though how whenever these laws are pushed though, the legislators are more interested in strongly identifying people to gate services despite the fact that they should have plenty of advice that things like zero-knowledge proofs exist. I hate to be cynical but I worry that this isn't going to matter, because it really seems that a lot of the pressure behind age verification isn't actually very interested in the…

It’s like they’re searching for a gap to fill with a product… where have I seen this go terribly wrong before?

Re: Opening up 'Zero-Knowledge Proof' technology to promote privacy in age assurance

#150
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Manosphere content is toxic and harmful but the hyperviolence and desensitisation of the former should not be downplayed. That's where the mass shooters evidently come from.

A hundred thousand furries consuming unfathomable amounts of porn without shooting up anyone kind of cast doubt about that point.

And 99 out of hundred get tired of porn at some point. We all have watched it and moved on. If only one can shoot and move on.
Post reply on HN