If you need personalized government attestation to visit a site, then the government has the ability to dynamically deny and rescind your individual access to any site that adopts age verification, at any time. Once adult sites adopt the system, it will creep over to any site wanting to limit their liability. Banks. Business services. Eventually almost everyone. Liability the government will dramatize and escalate. Y…
Opening up 'Zero-Knowledge Proof' technology to promote privacy in age assurance
141–150 of 302 posts
Re: Opening up 'Zero-Knowledge Proof' technology to promote privacy in age assurance
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is basically the double spending problem which has been solved in various ways.
For example, Chaum's blind signatures https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_signature let you create a credential that can be anonymously used once but it gets de-anonymized and invalidated if used a second time. This could be applied to age verification so that each credential could only be used once.
Re: Opening up 'Zero-Knowledge Proof' technology to promote privacy in age assurance
#143Re: Opening up 'Zero-Knowledge Proof' technology to promote privacy in age assurance
#144Re: Opening up 'Zero-Knowledge Proof' technology to promote privacy in age assurance
#145Age is just one metric. I don't want zero proof tech about information X. I don't want to have an identity. Full stop.
This can be used to have zero-proof knowledge of "over 18" or "not over 18". So they don't really get your age, except that you are in two broad ranges.
Re: Opening up 'Zero-Knowledge Proof' technology to promote privacy in age assurance
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not that I want my kids looking at porn or violent content, but I’m far more concerned about man-o-sphere influencers than that other stuff.
Manosphere content is toxic and harmful but the hyperviolence and desensitisation of the former should not be downplayed. That's where the mass shooters evidently come from.
Citation needed?
Re: Opening up 'Zero-Knowledge Proof' technology to promote privacy in age assurance
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
We need to stop this helicopter civilization bullshit. We're building 1984 to protect from god knows what imaginary harms. Stop putting plastic wrap around people's freedoms, liberty, and right to privacy.
The harms of smartphones and social media are about as far from imaginary as it could get. The data is screaming at us. We will look back at handing kids phones with instagram like giving kids cigarettes and think wtf were we doing.
Re: Opening up 'Zero-Knowledge Proof' technology to promote privacy in age assurance
#148Re: Opening up 'Zero-Knowledge Proof' technology to promote privacy in age assurance
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, but it's never been more important than now. Also, I did not have enough chars for an HN title.
Funny though how whenever these laws are pushed though, the legislators are more interested in strongly identifying people to gate services despite the fact that they should have plenty of advice that things like zero-knowledge proofs exist. I hate to be cynical but I worry that this isn't going to matter, because it really seems that a lot of the pressure behind age verification isn't actually very interested in the…
Re: Opening up 'Zero-Knowledge Proof' technology to promote privacy in age assurance
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
Manosphere content is toxic and harmful but the hyperviolence and desensitisation of the former should not be downplayed. That's where the mass shooters evidently come from.
A hundred thousand furries consuming unfathomable amounts of porn without shooting up anyone kind of cast doubt about that point.