Live data from Hacker News

European sentiments towards the US hit an all-time low

ecfr.eu

141–147 of 147 posts

Re: European sentiments towards the US hit an all-time low

#141
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They used to though. Russian money was destined exclusively for the far-left before 2015 or so.

There is credible evidence that Trump — that bastion of the far-left — has been a Russian asset since the 1980's...

Yes. Trump is a New Yorker. What do you think his party was when growing up? By the way, he has swapped political parties like he probably showers: every few years. Trump has been a democrat, registered, donor, everything you want, multiple times.

Re: European sentiments towards the US hit an all-time low

#142
post #96
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They used to though. Russian money was destined exclusively for the far-left before 2015 or so.

[citation needed] - I thought there was significant proven bribery across the German political spectrum?

Only in one sense. You get Russian money if you're extreme. Left, right, muslim extremist, anarchist, ... doesn't matter. As long as you're willing to sabotage Germany. But the CDU (and even Die Linke for that matter, everyone vaguely "normal") has to get it's Russian bribes the old fashioned way: with large industrial projects. No freebies.

Re: European sentiments towards the US hit an all-time low

#143
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Russia is good, actually" is a hard sell to anyone who has been indoctrinated by a lifetime of Western Russophobia. Is I think what you meant.

Technically true but it's also a hard sell to normal people who don't like wars of aggression, poisoning political opponents, and shooting down airliners.

The problem is that if you look at Russia's actions they are mostly rational and predictable. And by Russian standards Putin is a moderate. The Western wet dream is to "Yugoslavia" Russia. Balkanize it, load it with debt and take all of its assets. They had their man in Yeltsin, but he was such an egregious drunk that even the CIA couldn't get him reelected. In many ways, if you look at things objectively, there may not be a Russia without Putin.

(and you show me a major country where they aren't poisoning political opponents, conducting significantly less relevant wars than the one in Ukraine, and all kinds of other things)

Re: European sentiments towards the US hit an all-time low

#144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Technically true but it's also a hard sell to normal people who don't like wars of aggression, poisoning political opponents, and shooting down airliners.

The problem is that if you look at Russia's actions they are mostly rational and predictable. And by Russian standards Putin is a moderate. The Western wet dream is to "Yugoslavia" Russia. Balkanize it, load it with debt and take all of its assets. They had their man in Yeltsin, but he was such an egregious drunk that even the CIA couldn't get him reelected. In many ways, if you look at things objectively, there may…

I have no words for what I just read.

Re: European sentiments towards the US hit an all-time low

#145
post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is credible evidence that Trump — that bastion of the far-left — has been a Russian asset since the 1980's...

Yes. Trump is a New Yorker. What do you think his party was when growing up? By the way, he has swapped political parties like he probably showers: every few years. Trump has been a democrat, registered, donor, everything you want, multiple times.

> What do you think his party was when growing up?

This is indicative of Americas mental illness epidemic. You believe the neoliberal pro-corporate oligarchy party, that hasn't had a leftist president since Carter, is "the left"... without even a hint of irony.

We have always been at war with Eurasia.

Re: European sentiments towards the US hit an all-time low

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Don't underestimate the potential for a Russian dictator to cause suffering for his own people. Oh, I don't, believe me! But the thing is, Putin is already doing this . AIUI, he has been conscripting soldiers to fight in Ukraine for quite some time—to the point that he's had a hard time finding more conscripts already. I don't think there's much more he can do to force Russians onto the battlefield for him, whereve…

But he's been careful not to conscript from the big cities, for political reasons. He could raise a lot more conscripts... but there would be political consequences that he probably wouldn't like. So there are real constraints on what Putin is able (or at least willing) to do. Also, AIUI (and I could well be wrong), he at least says that he's not sending the conscripts to actually fight in Ukraine. Whether that's act…

He's got barely tapped reserves in NK and PRC.
Post reply on HN