Live data from Hacker News

US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate

dutchnews.nl

141–150 of 176 posts

Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate

#141
> Under the US Cloud Act, American companies are required to hand over all information they store to the government if requested to do so, even if it is stored abroad.

Hrm. It's my understanding that a US company is required to give almost no data to any government without a warrant.

Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have no idea how you can be aware of the history of Europe or the people involved with the EU and think this. It is incomprehensible. One of the most bizarre aspects of the EU is that has become a religion for people who have no idea that the basic principles of the EU are everything they oppose. But the EU started out as an industry group, the ECSC, to limit competition in coal and steel (with the helpful side eff…

The ECSC was about creating a common market. So we are talking about free trade within the community. Which is the literal opposite of what you’re describing? We are talking about a trade community that is literally about blocking countries from introducing discriminatory policies. I assume you see the EU as anti-democratic somehow? You seem to have pretty much everything backward. The ECSC is something covered in sc…

I wish European countries would love big government and centralization just as much as EU detractors say. We have way too much fragmentation, the overhead of coordinating so many small entities is just so high and a waste

Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate

#143
Follow the money. So far, there has been lots of posturing, but little budget behind those 'sovereignty' initiatives in the EU. Unless this changes, I am going to assume the puppets are just riding out time until their US masters are back in control.

Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate

#144
As always is some countries and especially in European ones. When citizens have to face the consequence of harmful data mining and sharing behaviors, it is ok because the officials are profiting of it.

When it is the officials that have to bear the consequences, then it is scandalous and something needs to be done about it. But just for them to be protected. They don't care for the general population.

Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate

#145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is amusing what he inflicts on USA and I thoroughly enjoy it ... But the idea that EU is taking leadership in this chaos is somewhere between laughable and delusional. Actually EU is getting fucked on every possible turn. We are the ones that pay trough the nose for all his follies. We are weaker than ever and we have delusional commission in charge. Compared to Ursula Trump is the reincarnation of Richelieu and B…

I can’t believe people even think that the EU is coming out ahead of this in any sort of way. It’s really delusional.

I think you’re framing it the wrong way.

Who is self harming more more aggressively, the US or the EU?

That’s the way I see it.

Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

These innovations don't count, since they didn't create any new oligarchs.

GDPR is innovation... I assume you don't live in the EU either...yes, there is an absolutely huge industry behind it, that is why it passed. Companies have to employ data protection officers, effectively a no-show job, and there is a whole industry of people connected to governments that facilitates this. And that also protects existing companies from competing because it is so expensive to handle customer data...as…

> GDPR does not increase productivity

Of course it doesn't, because the whole point of having GDPR is preventing companies from doing some productive stuff that would involve collection of personal data.

Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate

#147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Another way to look at it is that things just move slowly in government land. The tax office moving towards Microsoft has probably been in preparation for half a decade... And do you really believe the government is technically capable of switching DigiD to a different provider on a (relative) moments notice without causing large scale outages? We'll start seeing government bodies moving away from US IT suppliers in…

The actual question is if (capable) SWEs will choose working for (or be a founder of) Dutch/Euro tech companies over US ones, or even leave the US to live there. Europe is an excellent value prop if you want to be a bartender or baker. Its decidedly less so if you want to be a white collar/gold collar worker.

I left the US in my 20's to live in Europe and I like raising kids here (I'm now in my 40's) but honestly... it was a stupid thing to do. Meanwhile, my in-laws, who stayed in the US, are now retiring to France in their 40's with a few million dollars.

The opportunity cost of living in Europe is absolutely enormous. You're basically lighting $1-2 million (or more, perhaps) on fire for every decade you're here instead of the US.

Though I don't find myself wanting to move back to California any time soon...

Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate

#148
post #2

> However, stopping working with Microsoft and other US tech companies is not an option in the short term, he told the magazine. > Van der Burg is currently grappling with the issue of Solvinity, a Dutch cloud service provider which is widely used by government departments including the Digid identity system, and which is on the verge of being sold to a US company. > The Dutch tax office is also currently switching t…

Bert Hubert makes an argument based on Palantir: it's not simply the software. It's like a million dollar a day marine crane which comes with a crew. To put it another way, Microsoft, Oracle, Salesforce licenses are a tax compared to what is spent on consultants and integrators. That army knows a particular tech stack and also the relevant players.

https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/some-notes-on-palantir/

Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

These innovations don't count, since they didn't create any new oligarchs.

GDPR is innovation... I assume you don't live in the EU either...yes, there is an absolutely huge industry behind it, that is why it passed. Companies have to employ data protection officers, effectively a no-show job, and there is a whole industry of people connected to governments that facilitates this. And that also protects existing companies from competing because it is so expensive to handle customer data...as…

> well, good luck competing with the migrants they are flooding into the country.

Just couldn't have a rant without bringing up immigrants. Classic.

Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate

#150
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The US could simply give away $1 M per resident, removing the need for social policies and it would still come out cheaper.

The US has around 340 million people. Giving a million dollars to each one would be 340 trillion dollars.

That sounds like a great idea.

It would devalue the dollar a bit but you can print new price tags.

Just create a new similar shit coin

Post reply on HN