Hrm. It's my understanding that a US company is required to give almost no data to any government without a warrant.
US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate
141–150 of 176 posts
Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have no idea how you can be aware of the history of Europe or the people involved with the EU and think this. It is incomprehensible. One of the most bizarre aspects of the EU is that has become a religion for people who have no idea that the basic principles of the EU are everything they oppose. But the EU started out as an industry group, the ECSC, to limit competition in coal and steel (with the helpful side eff…
The ECSC was about creating a common market. So we are talking about free trade within the community. Which is the literal opposite of what you’re describing? We are talking about a trade community that is literally about blocking countries from introducing discriminatory policies. I assume you see the EU as anti-democratic somehow? You seem to have pretty much everything backward. The ECSC is something covered in sc…
Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate
#143Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate
#144When it is the officials that have to bear the consequences, then it is scandalous and something needs to be done about it. But just for them to be protected. They don't care for the general population.
Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is amusing what he inflicts on USA and I thoroughly enjoy it ... But the idea that EU is taking leadership in this chaos is somewhere between laughable and delusional. Actually EU is getting fucked on every possible turn. We are the ones that pay trough the nose for all his follies. We are weaker than ever and we have delusional commission in charge. Compared to Ursula Trump is the reincarnation of Richelieu and B…
I can’t believe people even think that the EU is coming out ahead of this in any sort of way. It’s really delusional.
Who is self harming more more aggressively, the US or the EU?
That’s the way I see it.
Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
These innovations don't count, since they didn't create any new oligarchs.
GDPR is innovation... I assume you don't live in the EU either...yes, there is an absolutely huge industry behind it, that is why it passed. Companies have to employ data protection officers, effectively a no-show job, and there is a whole industry of people connected to governments that facilitates this. And that also protects existing companies from competing because it is so expensive to handle customer data...as…
Of course it doesn't, because the whole point of having GDPR is preventing companies from doing some productive stuff that would involve collection of personal data.
Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
Another way to look at it is that things just move slowly in government land. The tax office moving towards Microsoft has probably been in preparation for half a decade... And do you really believe the government is technically capable of switching DigiD to a different provider on a (relative) moments notice without causing large scale outages? We'll start seeing government bodies moving away from US IT suppliers in…
The actual question is if (capable) SWEs will choose working for (or be a founder of) Dutch/Euro tech companies over US ones, or even leave the US to live there. Europe is an excellent value prop if you want to be a bartender or baker. Its decidedly less so if you want to be a white collar/gold collar worker.
The opportunity cost of living in Europe is absolutely enormous. You're basically lighting $1-2 million (or more, perhaps) on fire for every decade you're here instead of the US.
Though I don't find myself wanting to move back to California any time soon...
Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate
#148> However, stopping working with Microsoft and other US tech companies is not an option in the short term, he told the magazine. > Van der Burg is currently grappling with the issue of Solvinity, a Dutch cloud service provider which is widely used by government departments including the Digid identity system, and which is on the verge of being sold to a US company. > The Dutch tax office is also currently switching t…
Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
These innovations don't count, since they didn't create any new oligarchs.
GDPR is innovation... I assume you don't live in the EU either...yes, there is an absolutely huge industry behind it, that is why it passed. Companies have to employ data protection officers, effectively a no-show job, and there is a whole industry of people connected to governments that facilitates this. And that also protects existing companies from competing because it is so expensive to handle customer data...as…
Just couldn't have a rant without bringing up immigrants. Classic.
Re: US tech firms share Dutch regulator officials' names with Senate
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
The US could simply give away $1 M per resident, removing the need for social policies and it would still come out cheaper.
The US has around 340 million people. Giving a million dollars to each one would be 340 trillion dollars.
It would devalue the dollar a bit but you can print new price tags.
Just create a new similar shit coin