141–150 of 204 posts
I wonder why there isn't much for real estate in this package. Are they perhaps working on a totally different real estate project. I am in that space and very nervous about it getting wiped out by anthropic or openAI. To be honest, I am not sure why they still haven't make a big play for that industry.
It seems like they ripped out Lexis, which is probably one of the most important tools for lawyers: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-for-legal/pull/5 .
Can't we just use the version of the codebase from before that change?
As a lawyer, I'm excited about this, but there are two roadblocks that I'm not sure how Anthropic will navigate: (1) For non-lawyers who use these skills/connectors/whatchamacallits to try to get legal advice, their communications are not protected by attorney-client privilege. This will absolutely bite some people in the ass. (2) If a lawyer uses this with confidential client information (which, to the uninitiated,…
I wonder why there isn't much for real estate in this package. Are they perhaps working on a totally different real estate project. I am in that space and very nervous about it getting wiped out by anthropic or openAI. To be honest, I am not sure why they still haven't make a big play for that industry.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
I'm not sure if you're joking but there's actually active court cases right now where they have done just that Just a few of the perps: Hisham Abugharbieh (Florida student murders), Jonathan Rinderknecht (Palisades Fire arson), Phoenix Ikner (FSU shooter), Ryan Schaefer (Missouri State vandalism) There's also that thing involving somebody I think he used to be in the NFL and he was using ChatGPT to try to hide the bo…
As a lawyer, I'm excited about this, but there are two roadblocks that I'm not sure how Anthropic will navigate: (1) For non-lawyers who use these skills/connectors/whatchamacallits to try to get legal advice, their communications are not protected by attorney-client privilege. This will absolutely bite some people in the ass. (2) If a lawyer uses this with confidential client information (which, to the uninitiated,…
Wonder if people who decide to represent themselves would be allowed to use this service “live” on the courtroom. Usually people who represent themselves fall flat because they don’t know when it’s appropriate to invoke what and at time appear to putting legal words together that don’t make sense in a given context. This would certainly help these people, if allowed, and they don’t go off the rails.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Indeed, there is no way my terabytes per day of API calls is getting permanently stored anywhere. Perhaps an AI generated summary of it is.
interesting angle - how are/would compressed context (i.e. the parts of the user-LLM transcription likely to be saved) be treated by the courts? Would this be considered hearsay?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That might fall under the “unethical” part of my question. Could “probably” get away with it if done carefully, but I’d rather be fully in compliance.
Why would self-hosting for privacy reasons be unethical just because the query would be subject to subpoena in principle?
More importantly, I’d rather use SOTA models over self-hosted ones if possible.