Live data from Hacker News

Uber torches 2026 AI budget on Claude Code in four months

briefs.co

141–150 of 498 posts

Re: Uber torches 2026 AI budget on Claude Code in four months

#141
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So he's being paid and is sitting there letting an AI tool do his work for him? Insanity.

We didn’t mind when typesetting was automated. Or when compilers were invented. Why is this different?

Because he's paid to deliver code that works. Letting an AI agent do everything would be fine if it didn't make any mistakes, but that's far from reality.

Re: Uber torches 2026 AI budget on Claude Code in four months

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm currently in repos where the context window required is so large that the output is almost always "wrong" for the problem at hand. Quite a few people at my company burn through tokens this way, and it certainly isn't providing value to the company.

As always, improving accessibility for humans makes automation more effective. If the humans need to remember a PhD's worth of source code/documentation to contribute effectively, your codebase stinks.

I agree, in the general context of how I code.

The LLM hype train has me reflecting on what a spoiled existence working in a ‘proper’ language provides though…

React devs, JS devs, front-end devs working on large sites and frameworks might be triggering tens of files to be brought into context. What an OCaml dev can bring in through a 5 line union type can look very different in less token-efficient and terse languages.

Re: Uber torches 2026 AI budget on Claude Code in four months

#143
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

“I’m the prompter.”

I take the prompts to the AI so the manager doesn't have to! I have prompting skills!! I just can't make the joke work. There really are people that think they can get paid to press the agent's on button. How long before their checks stop clearing and it "just works itself out naturally"?

What color is your stapler?

Re: Uber torches 2026 AI budget on Claude Code in four months

#144
post #17

I take a peak every month or so at spend for my company and notice more and more are consumed $1k in tokens a month and it is bewildering to me how. I use llms daily, and see anywhere from $200-$400 tops. This is using the most expensive models, in deep thinking mode. So I'm not a Luddite against the usage of them. I just can't figure how _how_ to burn that much money a month responsibly. I genuinely challenge someon…

[dead]

Re: Uber torches 2026 AI budget on Claude Code in four months

#145
post #17

I take a peak every month or so at spend for my company and notice more and more are consumed $1k in tokens a month and it is bewildering to me how. I use llms daily, and see anywhere from $200-$400 tops. This is using the most expensive models, in deep thinking mode. So I'm not a Luddite against the usage of them. I just can't figure how _how_ to burn that much money a month responsibly. I genuinely challenge someon…

I dont use automated agent workflows or anything, I just use clause as a pair programmer of sorts. A month or so ago I used claude Opus 4.6 for 2-4 hours on API pricing and racked up $20 in spend, which surprised me since that was much higher than my usual.

I dont know about $10,000, but i can see hitting $1,000 pretty easily if you aren't looking at the costs.

Re: Uber torches 2026 AI budget on Claude Code in four months

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Begs the question if we should move on to minimal microservices so that whole project lives in context of llm. I hardly have to do anything when I'm working with small project with llm.

In my experience, the result is just more crawling across the separate microservices and additional reasoning to confirm how it all fits together. The monolithic codebases are easier to crawl for any problem that can't be conveniently isolated to a single microservice.

A good API should be documented, and AI should not have to read the internal code to understand how to use it.

Re: Uber torches 2026 AI budget on Claude Code in four months

#147
post #17

I take a peak every month or so at spend for my company and notice more and more are consumed $1k in tokens a month and it is bewildering to me how. I use llms daily, and see anywhere from $200-$400 tops. This is using the most expensive models, in deep thinking mode. So I'm not a Luddite against the usage of them. I just can't figure how _how_ to burn that much money a month responsibly. I genuinely challenge someon…

[dead]

Re: Uber torches 2026 AI budget on Claude Code in four months

#148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Are they just copy/pasting their entire ticket description into Claude Code and having it iterate until they land on something that works? That is exactly what they are doing, yes

And why wouldn't they? Companies are quite literally instructing them to do so. I work at such a company and have heard similar anecdotes from colleagues that work at other companies.

Why wouldn't you do this even if not instructed to do so?

I can do so much more with my spare time now. I throw agents at problems and get way more done.

$1k in tokens every day is easy to hit.

Re: Uber torches 2026 AI budget on Claude Code in four months

#149
post #17

I take a peak every month or so at spend for my company and notice more and more are consumed $1k in tokens a month and it is bewildering to me how. I use llms daily, and see anywhere from $200-$400 tops. This is using the most expensive models, in deep thinking mode. So I'm not a Luddite against the usage of them. I just can't figure how _how_ to burn that much money a month responsibly. I genuinely challenge someon…

One thing that stands out it is it sounds like you're using LLMs for only one part of your process. You're having LLMs help you write code, but the code you're writing doesn't itself make use of LLMs.

My current job basically involves trying to improve processes that themselves make heavy use of LLMs. Once you have multiple agents in parallel running multiple experiments on improving the performance of primarily LLM driven tools it's not that hard to get your token usage pretty high.

Re: Uber torches 2026 AI budget on Claude Code in four months

#150
post #17

I take a peak every month or so at spend for my company and notice more and more are consumed $1k in tokens a month and it is bewildering to me how. I use llms daily, and see anywhere from $200-$400 tops. This is using the most expensive models, in deep thinking mode. So I'm not a Luddite against the usage of them. I just can't figure how _how_ to burn that much money a month responsibly. I genuinely challenge someon…

I don't think it's about value. Tokenmaxxing is a thing now since that one CEO said he wants his $250k/yr devs to use $400-$500k/yr in tokens, so now it's all about how many agents can you have running concurrent tasks all day long.
Post reply on HN